State Seal CRCLogo

Meeting Proceedings for September 25, 1997

										1

1                      STATE OF FLORIDA
               CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION
2

3

4

5
                      COMMISSION MEETING
6

7

8

9
           DATE:     September 25, 1997
10
           TIME:     Commenced at 9:15 a.m.
11                   Concluded at 2:30 p.m.

12         PLACE:    The Senate Chamber
                     The Capitol
13                   Tallahassee, Florida

14         REPORTED BY:    JULIE L. DOHERTY, RPR
                           KRISTEN L. BENTLEY
15                         Court Reporters
                           Division of Administrative Hearings
16                         The DeSoto Building
                           1230 Apalachee Parkway
17                         Tallahassee, Florida

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25


              
 


                                                                        2

1                             APPEARANCES

2   	W. DEXTER DOUGLASS, CHAIRMAN

3   	CARLOS ALFONSO
      CLARENCE E. ANTHONY
4   	ANTONIO L. ARGIZ  (ABSENT)
      JUDGE THOMAS H. BARKDULL, JR.
5   	MARTHA WALTERS BARNETT
      ROBERT M. BROCHIN
6   	THE HONORABLE ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH
      KEN CONNOR
7  	CHRIS CORR  (ABSENT)
      SENATOR ANDER CRENSHAW  (ABSENT)
8   	VALERIE EVANS
      MARILYN EVANS-JONES
9   	BARBARA WILLIAMS FORD-COATES
      ELLEN CATSMAN FREIDIN
10   	PAUL HAWKES  (ABSENT)
      WILLIAM CLAY HENDERSON
11   	THE HONORABLE TONI JENNINGS  (ABSENT)
      THE HONORABLE GERALD KOGAN
12   	DICK LANGLEY
      JOHN F. LOWNDES
13   	STANLEY MARSHALL
      JACINTA MATHIS
14   	JON LESTER MILLS
      FRANK MORSANI
15   	ROBERT LOWRY NABORS
      CARLOS PLANAS  (ABSENT)
16   	JUDITH BYRNE RILEY
      KATHERINE FERNANDEZ RUNDLE
17   	SENATOR JIM SCOTT
      H. T. SMITH
18   	CHRIS T. SULLIVAN
      ALAN C. SUNDBERG
19   	JAMES HAROLD THOMPSON  (ABSENT)
      PAUL WEST
20   	JUDGE GERALD T. WETHERINGTON
      STEPHEN NEAL ZACK
21
      PAT BARTON  (ABSENT)
22   	IRA H. LEESFIELD
      LYRA BLIZZARD LOGAN
23

24

25


             
 


                                                                      3

1                             PROCEEDINGS

2             (Roll taken and recorded electronically.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioners, be seated and we

4        will come to order.  Commissioners and guests in the

5        gallery, please rise for the opening prayer given this

6        morning by Commissioner Evans.

7             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  Let us pray.  Our Father and

8        Creator, we invoke your guidance today as we begin to

9        consider the proposals for our Constitution.  We know that

10        the founding fathers of our great nation knew you and

11        followed your guidance in establishing our republic

12        according to your will.  Our founding fathers knew that

13        you are the ultimate authority for law and that you alone

14        are flawless.  They knew that man cannot successfully

15        tamper with that authority and they knew and required that

16        state constitutions adhere to that authority.  So again,

17        we ask that you use us today as your instruments so that

18        we can continue to maintain the greatness of this state

19        and nation all for your glory and honor.  Amen.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Henderson will lead

21        us in the pledge of allegiance to the flag.

22             (Pledge of allegiance.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We now proceed to the daily order

24        of business, receiving communications.

25             READING CLERK:  None on the desk, Mr. Chairman.

		
 

			                                                                          4

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Introductions of proposals.

2             READING CLERK:  None on the desk, Mr. Chairman.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Reports of committees.

4        Commissioner Barkdull, chairman of the rules and

5        administration, to discuss the commission meeting

6        schedule, process for today's consideration of public

7        proposals, necessity of committee meetings for today and

8        Friday.  Commissioner Barkdull.

9             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman and members of

10        the commission, on your desk you will find a written

11        report of the rules committee that met yesterday

12        afternoon.  The substance of it is, recommendation No. 1,

13        is that the commission go through the proposals that are

14        contained in your yellow booklet that is on your desk

15        dated September 17.  And this has the public's proposals

16        and their testimony through the first seven meetings, that

17        we will ultimately have to take up the last five meetings

18        at our next scheduled session in October.

19             The report also indicates that the calendar attached

20        is a schedule of meetings that has been altered somewhat

21        from what we had distributed earlier.

22             Principally it was occasioned by the Senate having

23        scheduled their committee meetings for January and

24        February.  And because the consensus of the rules

25        committee yesterday was that in lieu of having two


             
 

			                                                                          5

1        meetings in October, two in November and possibly two in

2        December, that we schedule only one meeting for each of

3        those months, I think we probably added a day or two to

4        that schedule.  So that is a significant change that has

5        been made in the proposed dates that we would meet.

6             The third recommendation was that we set a deadline

7        for consideration of public proposals that would come into

8        the office by way of mail primarily, now that we have

9        concluded the last of the oral public hearings.  And at

10        that date because we have been receiving and the public

11        has been on notice since June, and we of course traveled

12        the state to consider their proposed, whatever they wanted

13        to indicate, that that date be October 6.

14             Now we have been indicating all along that the

15        members should submit their individual proposals and they

16        can either draft them themselves or they can ask the

17        secretary to submit them to bill drafting and have them do

18        it for them.

19             We are recommending that the date for cutoff for the

20        individual members to file their suggestions would be

21        November 25.  The reason for this is that we have got to

22        get into the substance of these issues and determine

23        whether we are going to advance them towards being placed

24        on the ballot.

25             For all practical purposes, with the Legislature


                     
 

			                                                                          6

1        convening on the first Tuesday in March, which I believe

2        is either the 2nd or 3rd of March, the great bulk of our

3        work has got to be done, I think, and the committee feels,

4        probably by the end of February.  And those of you will

5        see that January and February have blanked out two weeks

6        for each of those months.  If we don't need them, that's

7        fine, but you should have the opportunity to know at this

8        point for your calendars at home when you might be

9        expected up here to wrap up the final votes and

10        consideration of the packaging of these proposals so that

11        we will be substantially complete with our work by the end

12        of February.

13             That concludes the report, Mr. Chairman.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Evans-Jones.

15             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  Mr. Chairman, I move

16        acceptance of the rules committee report.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Debate?  Commissioner

18        Scott.

19             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  All right.  Mr. Chairman, for

20        some time now, I have struggled and several of us have

21        struggled with a way to handle these public proposals, and

22        in general I suppose the work of the commission.

23             Let me start from the back end.  Yesterday we found

24        out, I think Judge Barkdull and I at the same time, that

25        this list we have here does not include Daytona,


                     
 

			                                                                          7

1        Ft. Myers, Tampa and of course Tallahassee, which was just

2        yesterday, as well as as many, 150 I think I heard or 200

3        or maybe more written proposals that have been submitted

4        to the commission office.

5             So what I have come up with, working with several

6        commissioners, as a way to get this public proposals

7        moving is on your desk.  It is a list of several items

8        which have been brought up by the public.  It is -- it is

9        not me or anyone else who might agree with this, it is not

10        our endorsement that any action is necessary on these

11        proposals, but that they had significant public interest

12        or in some cases that we know -- and in some cases we know

13        that members are going to file them.

14             They have been arranged by articles and I suppose

15        what I would like to do is prior to adoption to report on

16        how we proceed is to discuss the idea of putting out this

17        list of basically committee proposals or copies that would

18        go to committees.  The committees would then take the

19        public proposal, discuss it, determine what they want to

20        file and that they would then be able to file the

21        proposals for consideration of the commission.

22             Now, the other way is fine.  We can go through, on

23        any particular subject, we move a particular item.  And I

24        might point out to you that the public proposals -- we

25        have had all these public hearings and they have been


                     
 

			                                                                          8

1        listed and they are published in the journal.  So the

2        question are they being considered, they have been

3        considered.

4             So when appropriate, and I've not made the motion, I

5        don't know exactly, I would like to make a motion and the

6        commission look at this list and see if this covers most

7        of your, of the concerns that you feel have been raised or

8        that you think the commission could consider based on the

9        public input we have received.

10             Keeping in mind that in addition to this, any member

11        can file any proposal that they wish to at any time up to

12        a deadline, which is, if we adopt the rules committee

13        report, sets forth a deadline in I think November.  And if

14        you want to add something to this motion for the

15        committees to consider, you could add to it.

16             So I wanted to raise this subject and I did try to

17        raise it, I mentioned it at the rules committee yesterday,

18        and I mentioned it before to the chairman of rules and to

19        the chairman of the commission.

20             So with that discussion, I would like to, when

21        appropriate, move this motion.  And it is not in lieu of,

22        although it was originally discussed, it is not in lieu of

23        going through but at least when we go through these item

24        by item, if you adopted this, you would know what items

25        are going to be submitted for consideration and you could


                     
 

			                                                                          9

1        take that under consideration as to whether you wanted to

2        move and discuss and debate and try to have ten votes on

3        any particular procedure.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Mills.

5             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Mr. Chairman, one of the things

6        I think that we have all shared in this process is how

7        special the public participation has been.  We have had

8        people who absolutely have been terminal patients, who

9        have had personal problems, who have been willing to share

10        with this commission things that you wonder if they would

11        share with their priest.  So I think that we feel a pretty

12        special relationship to the public.

13             And what I have -- I have been discussing this issue

14        both with Judge Barkdull and Commissioner Scott -- and

15        what they absolutely have in common is that same respect

16        for the public proposals.  And so what we are trying to

17        figure out here collectively as a commission, how can we

18        give the respect to those public proposals they deserve.

19        And I think there is probably some merit in both of these.

20             We also know that we are going to be around a long

21        time in committees considering this, so what we might do,

22        Mr. Chairman, to respect these approaches for considering

23        is take at least a brief recess so we could look at

24        Commissioner Scott's list, discuss how procedurally we

25        might be able to do actually both, in some way, because


                     
 

			                                                                          10

1        both have some, have merit.

2             And I think that I have the sense of the commission,

3        we would like to give thorough, valid consideration to the

4        public so that we understand that, and the public

5        understands that we are going to fulfill the faith they

6        have placed in us.  So I think that possibly five or ten

7        minutes to take a look at the list and then decide how we

8        might proceed procedurally to meet those purposes.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Before we go further,

10        I think most people are like me, I didn't get this until

11        just a few minutes ago.  I haven't had a chance to look at

12        it.  And I didn't really know about this, I thought we

13        were dealing with the rules committee, until this morning.

14             So I think it would be appropriate, certainly, if we

15        recessed for about ten minutes to give everybody an

16        opportunity to look this over and the rules committee

17        report, which had come to us yesterday.  So I'll entertain

18        a motion by Judge Barkdull for a ten-minute recess.

19             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  So moved.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor say aye.

21             (All respond affirmatively.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We will recess for ten minutes

23        and we will be back in the chamber at 20 minutes until

24        10:00.  Keep the chamber closed please.  Secure the

25        chamber.  It is 9:28, 20 minutes until.  Incidentally,


                     
 

			                                                                          11

1        there is a shorter version of these public proposals in

2        the journal that is on your desk.

3             (Brief recess.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioners, come to order.  We

5        need to get going.  All right.  Commissioners, please take

6        your seats and we will start.

7             All right.  We are now back in session.  Commissioner

8        Barkdull?

9             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Chairman, please note I'd

10        like to speak in opposition to the motion.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You have that right.  Do you have

12        something, Senator Scott?

13             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  I'm going to make a motion.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Wait a minute, there is not a

15        motion.

16             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I thought he made the motion.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No, no, he did not; he did not.

18        So there is nothing to debate at this point.  You said you

19        were going to move it.

20             Order please.  Commissioner Evans-Jones.

21             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  There is a motion on the

22        floor because I made that we accept the rules.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That is correct.  That is the

24        motion that's on the floor.  That is the motion that's on

25        the floor, that we accept the report of the rules


                     
 

			                                                                          12

1        committee.  And, Judge Barkdull, you want to speak to

2        that?

3             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  No, I want to speak in favor

4        of that, but it was my understanding Commissioner Scott

5        said he was going to propose this substitute or in lieu

6        thereof.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Let's don't get too balled

8        up.  Do you want to move that, Senator Scott -- excuse me,

9        Commissioner Scott?

10             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  I would like to move it,

11        Mr. Chairman, at the appropriate time.  If the appropriate

12        time is now, then I would like to move that -- I would

13        make the motion.

14             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Mr. Chairman?

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Mills.

16             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  The way we could make some

17        progress here is to go ahead and vote in favor of the

18        report, right?  Well you can vote in favor of the report

19        and then this motion really is aside from the report,

20        isn't it?  I mean, it is a motion outside the report.

21             (Off-the-record comment.)

22             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Well, all I'm suggesting is that

23        you, if you move to accept the report then you have a

24        process set for consideration, then you could have --

25        because this motion, as drafted by Senator Scott, is to


                     
 

			                                                                          13

1        waive the rules.  So it would supersede whatever you have.

2             The acceptance of the motion and the unanimous

3        support doesn't preclude Senator Scott from making a

4        motion to waive the rules.  So therefore we could all

5        happily vote for the rules committee report, Senator Scott

6        could make his motion, and hypothetically someone could

7        move to defer consideration of that motion.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think that's a correct

9        explanation.  Before the commission is the report of the

10        rules committee on motion to approve it.  If it is

11        approved, Senator Scott's motion would be in order as a

12        motion to waive the rules.

13             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman --

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Scott.  I have got

15        to remember you are Commissioner Scott.

16             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  I would move to amend the rules

17        committee report to provide that the following topics

18        outlined in this motion be referred to the committees and

19        the committees be allowed to develop committee proposals

20        to be filed with the secretary for consideration.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Scott, that requires

22        waiver of the rules.  Committees cannot offer committee

23        proposals, they can only offer substantive proposals and

24        the proposals have to be introduced by a member.  I'm not

25        sure it would be appropriate to amend this motion that


                     
 

			                                                                          14

1        way.

2             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Let me get a little bit of

3        parliamentary help.  I don't care about arguing the

4        parliamentary part.  What I want to do, what I have tried

5        to do here is to get us some public proposals, from the

6        public proposals that would be committee proposals.  And

7        I'm not trying to exclude anything.  Everybody can still

8        file whatever.

9             So however it is appropriate to do that, and I

10        personally think, maybe the members, I understand some of

11        them may disagree, that if we are going to adopt this we

12        ought to adopt it so we know that these topics are going

13        to be taken up by the committees.  Another idea was to

14        defer it.

15             Wherever it is appropriate to make this motion.  It

16        could be a substitute motion, it is a majority vote,

17        right?  If I make a substitute motion to adopt the report

18        with this --

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Not on the issue of the waiver of

20        the rules on the committee introducing proposals.

21             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Mr. Chairman, as a point of

22        order, I disagree with that, if I may.  You are only

23        amending --

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Langley, you are

25        recognized, sir.  Your mic is on now.


                     
 

			                                                                          15

1             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Yes, sir.  Commissioner

2        Douglass, Mr. Chairman, it would only take a majority to

3        amend the motion.  Then it would take, if that motion is

4        amended in that it changed the rules, it would then take a

5        two thirds to pass the amended motion.  But Mr. Scott's

6        motion would only take a majority.

7             All we are trying to do is -- you know, I counted, if

8        you didn't, there are 393 proposals so far.  And we don't

9        have Ft. Myers, Daytona Beach, Tallahassee and some other

10        area in here, Tampa, yet.  A lot of people went to a lot

11        of trouble and this is very dear and near to their hearts,

12        the proposals they make.  You-all want to sit here and you

13        have got 20 proposals on whether or not to amend the age

14        and privacy.  If you want to vote down 19 of them and

15        accept one, that's what we will be doing today if we go

16        through these item by item by item.  Or do you want to

17        vote up all 20 of them?  It is kind of ridiculous.

18             The way I think for the orderly process would be to

19        take up Senator Scott's motion and let any member here

20        amend that motion if, from your review of what's presented

21        to us, it is either improperly worded or not inclusive

22        enough to have the issue that you have interest in.  And

23        then amend that motion to include all of those and I think

24        we will have a unanimous vote on the motion when it is

25        over.


                     
 

			                                                                          16

1             And then to the public who have worked these things

2        up and came and presented them to us, they are not

3        rejected.  Look there is my proposal, it is embodied in

4        that motion and there it is in committee and I am going

5        somewhere with it.  Rather than, golly, they vote I

6        couldn't get ten votes on my proposal.

7             So anyway I think, again, my point of rising,

8        Mr. Chairman, was to say procedurally we only need a

9        majority on Senator Scott's motion.  And if that results

10        in a rule change, then that motion would need two thirds.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Barkdull.

12             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman and members of

13        the commission, my problem with this is, this is not what

14        we told the public we were going to do.  We told the

15        public that we were going out to hear what they had to say

16        because that's what we took an oath to do.  That's what

17        the Constitution required us to do is have public

18        hearings.

19             We laid out in our rules, which has been public for

20        over 90 days, that when the commission met at the

21        conclusion of the public hearings, we were going to

22        consider each item that they brought up.  And if one

23        member of the commission wanted to move further

24        consideration of that item, and he could get nine other

25        members of the commission to go along with the fact that


                     
 

			                                                                          17

1        one member of the commission wanted further consideration,

2        the matter would be continued further.

3             And that there would be -- there was nothing in our

4        rules that indicated that we were going to try to sit down

5        and be selective about which of the public issues we were

6        going to consider.  We told them we were going to consider

7        all of them.  We laid out in our rules specifically how we

8        were going to do it.  And as this proposed motion says, it

9        is in lieu and "in lieu" means instead of what we told the

10        public.  And that's why I oppose it.  And I think we

11        should stand with the rule we adopted and go through and

12        consider the public items, item by item as we told the

13        public we were going to do.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Any further

15        discussion?  Commissioner Wetherington.

16             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  What's the Chair's view

17        on this issue?  I don't see how --

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  My view is I, we have a rules

19        committee, it met, and they made this recommendation based

20        on the rules and on our previous commitments.  And

21        obviously, as the Chair, I would support my committee.

22             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  Well I don't understand

23        that Senator Scott's proposal is going to be an indication

24        that the commission is not going to be considering all the

25        proposals.  So I don't read it that way at all.


                     
 

			                                                                          18

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'm not going to get into the

2        debate on what his proposal means.  I'm just saying my

3        position as chairman is to support the rules committee,

4        which I think is appropriate.  And the rules committee

5        report, if it is adopted, then other motions are

6        appropriate.  Commissioner Mills?

7             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Well if I understand where we

8        are, I think the only motion that's been made, I think, is

9        the adoption of the rules committee report.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  There has been a motion on the

11        floor to adopt the rules committee report and I think

12        Senator Scott wants to make a motion to amend that that

13        excludes waiver of the rules.

14             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  If Senator Scott waited until

15        after the vote on this motion, then it would seem to me to

16        be just as timely.  I understand it would require two

17        thirds.  Senator Langley is saying that if you take it as

18        an amendment, it could be only a majority, but that if you

19        take it up after this, it would require two thirds.  I

20        don't disagree with that.

21             But the substance of the motion requires a waiver

22        anyway.  But I mean it is Senator Scott's motion.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'm going to have to quit calling

24        them senators too, but they are commissioners.  And I'll

25        try to not do that as well.  Commissioner Barnett?


                     
 

			                                                                          19

1             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  Mr. Chairman, it seems to me

2        that senator, Commissioner Scott's proposal has a lot of

3        merit in terms of how we organize our work.  And that the

4        real focus of his motion is to come to some orderly way to

5        address several hundred public proposals.  And for that

6        reason, I like it.  I think it's a rational approach to a

7        very daunting task.

8             On the other hand, I think that Commissioner Barkdull

9        is absolutely right in that we have made numerous

10        statements to the public that we will consider their

11        proposals.  And the, what I would like to do is have an

12        opportunity today to review the public proposals that have

13        been presented and perhaps take up Senator Scott's motion

14        or his idea in whatever appropriate forum at the end of

15        the day after we have had a chance to look at the types of

16        items he has referred to in his listing.

17             I don't know what some of these mean.  I don't know,

18        for example, whether -- we were just talking, Commissioner

19        Connor and I -- whether the reference to merit retention

20        also includes the election of judges.  Some people would

21        say, yes, they do, but I don't know.  I mean, they are

22        very different concepts.  And I think it is important for

23        us to make sure we go through and have an opportunity to

24        give some consideration to these matters.

25             I don't see, for example, the net ban on here.  Well


                     
 

			                                                                          20

1        perhaps the net ban is something that can't get ten votes,

2        but perhaps it can.  We will not be able to say to the

3        public that the commission adequately considered an issue

4        that we heard enormous amounts of pointed and emotional

5        testimony.

6             And so before I could support this, I would like to

7        have some discussion of the issues.  Let's amend, you

8        know, modify, expand, whatever this type of list and then

9        I think we might want to take the position that this is an

10        orderly way to conduct our business.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Nabors?

12             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  Yeah, I don't want to add to

13        the load here, but the thing that I have been struggling

14        with, and it goes to what Commissioner Langley said, is

15        when we get to a proposal, for example, that has like 20

16        different permutations to it, under our rule, as I

17        understand them, if I move that then I am the sponsor of

18        that, and I have got the burden of carrying that proposal

19        through.

20             It seems to me that if you really boil this down,

21        there are 20 or so concepts embodied, or maybe more, in

22        this whole process, and maybe an answer would be if we get

23        to an area like valid access, rather than me having to

24        vote on a particular proposal, because that individual

25        made a particular proposal, not as it was wedded in stone,


                     
 

			                                                                          21

1        that a person could move the concept of valid access to

2        committee.

3             Then they wouldn't have the burden of having to

4        sponsor that, if it gets ten votes, it goes to committee,

5        committee takes it up.  That way there is certainty about

6        what we do.  And we can then run through a lot of these

7        proposals because they are all centered around the same

8        concept.

9             When we have meetings next week and the next week, if

10        it is a concept that's already been moved, there is

11        nothing wrong with taking public testimony on that concept

12        and it wouldn't necessitate another vote on a specific

13        proposal.  That might be a middle ground.  I'm very

14        sympathetic with both views, but it seems to me -- I have

15        an awkward time on voter initiative, like a statutory

16        initiative.  Which one do I pick that I'm going to vote

17        on?

18             And if I pick it, that means I have got to carry the

19        load of that initiative.  And it seems to me that what we

20        need to do is find what is the body of proposals that we

21        want to agree on.  Because everybody can always file an

22        individual proposal on their own.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let me give you what I would rule

24        in that regard.  As we go through these, if you get 11

25        votes on something like you are talking about, the subject


                     
 

			                                                                          22

1        matter, it will be referred to committee as a public

2        proposal.  It would list whoever moved it as the sponsor

3        of the public proposal.  It would not prevent that person

4        from opposing it or otherwise because my understanding

5        would be that the vote today on these, the 11 -- ten-vote

6        requirement, only moves it forward.  It doesn't say you

7        are for it or against it either.

8             And if you don't vote for it, it doesn't say you are

9        against it.  And I would rule that's the case.  And so

10        whoever moved one of these public proposals would not be

11        vouching for that specific proposal, but the committee

12        then could consider all subject matters surrounding that

13        proposal.  That would be the way I would interpret it.

14        Does the rules chair interpret it that way, too?

15             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  No disagreement.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Commissioner

17        Evans-Jones.

18             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  Mr. Chairman and members

19        of the commission, I feel very strongly that we have made

20        a commitment to the general public.  We have said that we

21        are going to consider all of the proposals.  All the

22        proposals are not listed in what Mr. Scott has presented.

23        I understand that he has said we can add to, and I think

24        that we should.

25             The other problem that I have is going straight to


                     
 

			                                                                          23

1        committee.  There may be people who would like to sponsor

2        the concept, the public concept, and can get those ten

3        votes that would not be a member of the committee that it

4        is referred to.  And I think that that would bring

5        additional debate, conversation and so forth to that

6        committee if you are really very, very interested in that

7        particular public proposal.

8             I do think that this is an arduous process and I

9        recognize that.  But I think that since we said that we

10        are going to consider every single proposal that has been

11        sent to us, that we have an obligation to do just that.

12        And I recognize that it is time consuming, but I think

13        once you have made a commitment, and we have said this

14        from the very beginning, that it really is, you know,

15        going back on what we have committed to do.  And I don't

16        think we should do that.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Commissioner Langley?

18             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Mr. Chairman and body, it

19        isn't only time consuming, Commissioner Evans-Jones, it is

20        staff consuming.  So are we going to vote, as Commissioner

21        Nabors said, are we going to vote for all 20 ballot access

22        proposals because is any one better than the other?

23             Then according to these rules, all proposals

24        receiving that will advance to bill drafting, receive a

25        number and be referred to committee.  So now we are going


                     
 

			                                                                          24

1        to have 20 bills in that committee, proposals, all on

2        valid access?  All we are trying to do -- and, again, we

3        can consider any public proposal here that is not included

4        in this abbreviated motion.  But you don't want bill

5        drafting to be sitting there drafting 20 proposals on

6        ballot access or we will never get our work done.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Riley?

8             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Mr. Chairman, in the interest of

9        time, we have spent an hour deciding how we are not going

10        to do it.  I feel that more is better at this point and I

11        would strongly suggest that we move the rules of the

12        committee and that we use Commissioner Scott's list as we

13        go through that and vote on them not by individual

14        proposals, but as, by issues.  And that issue can be for

15        and against the same issue.  And that we just vote that on

16        to the committee and that we get on with it.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  I think it needs to

18        be made clear that any commissioner at any time can

19        introduce a proposal, number one.

20             Number two, the fact that it doesn't get ten votes

21        doesn't mean it is not being considered.  The specific

22        proposal might not be, but if there is one that embodies

23        the subject matter, the committee can consider the entire

24        subject.

25             Commissioner Sundberg.


                     
 

			                                                                          25

1             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  Mr. Chairman, I sense we are

2        really sort of talking about two different things and I

3        think perhaps Commissioner Riley has put her finger on it.

4        So if I may to the rules chairman address a question.

5        Commissioner Barkdull, do you perceive that -- and I join

6        those who say that we have an obligation to consider each

7        of the proposals that have been put forward by the public.

8             The question is, when we then move to consider those

9        proposals, as has been stated numerous times here, there

10        are shaded permutations of the same issue that have been

11        present, eight, ten, 12 different times.  Are we going to

12        have to vote each of those issues up or down, or will we

13        be in a position to say, that fits within the rubric of

14        election reform and that we then may vote it up or down,

15        you know, depending on how that particular motion is

16        amended?  So that we don't have to vote precisely on each

17        proposal so long as that proposal is embodied in a larger

18        aggregation of that issue.

19             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Was that a question or a

20        statement?

21             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  That was a very comprehensive

22        statement.

23             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  It is my understanding that

24        if the subject of elections were referred to a committee,

25        by receiving the necessary ten votes, that the committee


                     
 

			                                                                          26

1        under the rules has the opportunity to present a

2        substitute on the same subject matter.

3             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  Obviously my question was too

4        comprehensive.  I'm not talking about what the committee

5        does with it.  I'm talking about as we move forward today,

6        let's assume that there are seven different proposals

7        which are, as I say, shaded gradations of a particular

8        issue.

9             Merit retention, and so long as we are satisfied that

10        it leaves open the question, should all judges be elected,

11        should all judges be subject to merit selection and merit

12        retention or some part of it, so long as we are all

13        satisfied that the issue is framed to be comprehensive

14        enough, may we vote on it in that fashion without going

15        through, as Commissioner Langley indicated, and say, well,

16        there were nine proposals for election of judges, there

17        were 12 for merit retention and we have to address each

18        one of them.

19             Or may we package them, so to speak, as a group here

20        and send it to committee, do it in that comprehensive

21        fashion.

22             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I think if we voted, say, to

23        take up merit retention and it went to a committee, and

24        obviously merit retention is contrary to election.  And

25        the committee would have the right, after merit retention


                     
 

			                                                                          27

1        had been forwarded to them, to determine whether they were

2        going to submit that back out to the body or whether they

3        were going to offer a substitute for it.  But the next

4        step on the line is committee consideration.

5             And I don't think that the rules limit, once the

6        subject matter is in the committee, as to what the

7        committee can do with it.

8             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  I agree with that.  My

9        question goes to how we must package it when we send it to

10        committee.

11             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  As I said, Commissioner

12        Sundberg, if you send merit retention to a committee, the

13        method of merit retention, which presumes that we would

14        not have election, would take both issues up before the

15        committee, in any form that the committee determined to

16        bring it out.

17             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Commissioner Barkdull, may I ask

18        a question?

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Riley?

20             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to ask a question

21        following that.  Does that mean, does that preclude then a

22        commissioner, when you come to an article that has within

23        that section seven different proposals, could you not

24        then, some of them being for and some of them being

25        against, could you not as a commissioner make a motion to


                     
 

			                                                                          28

1        pass through all of the proposals in which case what you

2        are saying doesn't say that, but in fact in action we

3        could do it that way and that would answer Commissioner

4        Sundberg's --

5             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  If that's what are listed

6        under the section.

7             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  So, in fact, we would move

8        forward the whole issue and all of its permutations.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let me just interrupt and say

10        that the rules committee report does not require the

11        consideration of every single item on here.  What it

12        requires under the rules committee report is for somebody

13        to move it forward.  And that doesn't mean you are for or

14        against it, you are not voting it up or down, as I

15        understand the rules committee report.

16             So we will not -- we will be considering them by

17        article.  And if nobody moves one, two or whatever, we

18        will move to the next article.  But so failure for

19        somebody to move in effect eliminates any votes on that

20        particular item.  If somebody wants to move the particular

21        item or items, one at a time they can, under the rules

22        committee report.

23             But in no instance is the person moving it deemed to

24        be necessarily supporting it.  He is doing it for the

25        purpose of fulfilling what we said we would do to the


                     
 

			                                                                          29

1        public.  Commissioner Mills.

2             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Mr. Chairman, first I think it

3        is worth saying that to understand why we are spending

4        time doing this is I think everybody wants to have full

5        and fair public consideration and the public needs to

6        understand that.  Doing this up front and having this

7        conversation uniformly is true in the chamber, everybody

8        is trying to do the best thing to enhance public

9        consideration.

10             Having said that, based on the Chair's ruling which

11        says that you can make a motion to consider issues

12        collectively, and it wouldn't necessarily be a member

13        issue; is that correct?  I think Commissioner Riley's idea

14        also makes sense that you are trying to consolidate

15        different ideas under a given motion, thereby giving

16        comprehensive consideration to a number of public ideas.

17             So if I was one of the ten people that suggested

18        election reform, if election reform is referred to the

19        election committee, I know I can go to that committee and

20        discuss my idea.  Because election reform has been

21        preserved as a public idea.  And irrespective of whether

22        any particular language is drafted at this moment, it will

23        be able to be considered, whether it is parental consent

24        or different issues, that those issues will be preserved.

25             Senator Scott has a list of issues and I understand


                     
 

			                                                                          30

1        one option would be actually for Senator Scott or someone

2        to make a motion on each of Senator Scott's topics, or for

3        that to be viewed as a list of topics.  And if each one of

4        those got ten votes, at the beginning of that article,

5        that would in effect accomplish the same thing; would it

6        not?

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's correct.

8             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  And to procedurally get us to

9        that point, if someone wanted to offer a substitute motion

10        to do that, I don't believe that's inconsistent with the

11        rules.  It is consistent with the rules as described by

12        the rules chairman, as interpreted by the Chair.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Nothing would prevent somebody

14        from moving a particular item at any time.  I think it

15        would result in that.  Commissioner Scott, you wanted to

16        be recognized?

17             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Well as I understand, that's

18        fine.  I mean, when we get to Article I there is these

19        suggestions and, you know, we bring them up and we don't

20        have to get into two thirds or whatever.

21             I just want to make one point and that is, this is

22        not in lieu of, Judge Barkdull.  I want to make that

23        point.  This is not in lieu of the opportunity of going

24        through every article, if this motion was adopted.  But to

25        do it that way is fine with me.


                     
 

			                                                                          31

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Anthony.

2             COMMISSIONER ANTHONY:  Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

3        Given that comment by Commissioner Scott, I'd like to move

4        to call the question on the motion.  Oh, we don't have

5        that.  I'm sorry.

6             SECRETARY BLANTON:  We just moved the adoption of the

7        committee report.

8             COMMISSIONER ANTHONY:  I'd like to move the adoption

9        of the committee report.  Given that we have spent an hour

10        discussing, why don't we try to get into some action?

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Ford-Coates was next

12        and then, Commissioner Zack, you will follow.

13             COMMISSIONER FORD-COATES:  I'd just like to get a

14        clarification on what I think we are talking about,

15        modifying our process of what happens when it gets to

16        committee.

17             As we originally adopted the rules before we went

18        through the public hearing and really had a chance to

19        listen to what people were saying and have a real concept

20        of what we were, of the magnitude of issues with which we

21        would be dealing, the original concept was that staff

22        would draft a proposal that goes to committee.

23             If we are moving ideas and larger issues then, are we

24        not saying that it is going to be more a process of

25        discovery, or whatever the right term would be, of


                     
 

			                                                                          32

1        research of what proposals that committee would like to

2        see, the specifics of those, therefore staff would not be

3        drafting umpteen proposals.  I think we need to clarify

4        that, because we do have a limited staff, to make sure

5        that we understand how we would be operating.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Commissioner Zack.

7             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  First of all, I have a minor

8        housekeeping matter before the report is actually adopted.

9        In talking to various commissioners during the recess, it

10        was felt that since our next meeting is going to begin on

11        a Monday morning, that we could begin at 9:00 a.m. on

12        Monday, come in Sunday evening, and work late the Monday,

13        Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday and therefore be able to

14        adjourn on Thursday evening.  And it was felt that for

15        everyone's scheduling purposes that might be an

16        improvement as to doing it during the five days presently

17        scheduled.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  I think we could take

19        that up after we get this matter resolved and the rules

20        committee might consider that.

21             Commissioner Connor, you wanted to be recognized.

22             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  That was just the first thing.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Excuse me, he is not through.

24             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  That was just a minor matter that

25        needs to be addressed before the report is actually


                     
 

			                                                                          33

1        adopted.  But I do think it is extremely important that it

2        is clear to the public that not only are each -- not only

3        will each matter be considered by each member of this

4        commission, but as you pointed out and has been pointed

5        out repeatedly, every single commissioner has the right to

6        put this on at any time.  So you have every one of us

7        continuing to consider it all the way until November 25,

8        which I believe is the deadline when any one of us can

9        raise any of these 300-plus public issues at any time.

10             So this is a continuing process.  And whatever we do

11        here today should not be perceived as closing the door on

12        any of these public proposals.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Now Commissioner Connor.

14             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  And

15        part of my question involves who decides the issue.  For

16        example, concerns that I had raised in my discussion with

17        Senator Scott was whether or not the way in which it is

18        framed, right of privacy versus parental authority, is

19        broad enough to include expanded protection for unborn

20        children without regard to the issue of parental consent,

21        and whether or not the issue of merit retention, as

22        framed, is broad enough to raise the issue as to whether

23        or not all judges should be required to be elected.

24             Now my question is ultimately who decides, by when do

25        we know the effect of the ruling.  Because I think what


                     
 

			                                                                          34

1        most of us are concerned about is whether or not there is

2        a drop dead date after which we may not be permitted to

3        come forward with a proposal that we thought was

4        adequately covered by the way in which it was framed, only

5        to discover by someone's ruling, I know not whom at this

6        point, they decide that it is not fairly embraced within

7        the language that was adopted.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The drop dead date under the

9        proposal of the rules committee is November 25.

10        Commissioner Scott.

11             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, in further answer,

12        if we are going with the procedure we seem to have a

13        consensus on that Commissioner Mills has proposed, when

14        that item comes up, you can move appropriate amendment

15        language, whatever you want, to make sure what it covers.

16             (Off-the-record comment.)

17             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  No, it would be today as we get

18        to that item.  If you, you know -- and further, as we

19        discussed, we have the right to introduce a member's

20        proposal at any time.  So, Mr. Chairman, I think we kind

21        of narrowed in here on a procedure that we would go

22        through, look at these items --

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We have some others that want to

24        speak and I don't want to cut them off.

25             Commissioner Barkdull, will you yield to Commissioner


                     
 

			                                                                          35

1        Freidin?

2             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  With regard to the rest of the

3        committee's report, the deadline for public proposals that

4        the committee recommends is October 6, 1997.  It is kind

5        of down at the end of the committee report.  I don't know

6        if anybody got that far.  It seems to me that that is

7        about a week from now.  By the time that word gets out to

8        the public, it is going to be only a matter of days.  And

9        it seems to me like that's a little short and I would like

10        to see that lengthened.  I'd like to hear what the

11        committee's thinking was on why it needed to be that

12        quickly.

13             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  The committee's thinking was

14        that it has been open for the public to submit things in

15        writing, and that's what we are talking about, since the

16        commission was organized in June.  We are going to be up

17        here -- as it turns out now, we are going to be up here

18        two weeks later.  When we originally picked that date, we

19        were scheduled to be up here a week later.

20             And we were trying to get all the matters that will

21        be considered by the commission that the public proposed

22        where we had to exercise discretion on the ten-day vote,

23        where we would take them all up at the next meeting.

24             I would certainly not object, now that we have moved

25        to the 20th as being the time we are going to come back up


                     
 

			                                                                          36

1        here, move it to the 13th.  But I don't think it ought to

2        be moved any further up than that because we have got to

3        give staff an opportunity to incorporate it in our

4        materials which we would take up.  But I think it would be

5        no problem in accepting an amendment at the appropriate

6        time moving that date from the 6th to the 13th.

7             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  I don't know when the

8        appropriate time would be.

9             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Well, when we get through

10        with this motion.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let me say -- excuse me,

12        Commissioner Barnett.  Would you yield to Commissioner

13        Barnett?

14             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  No, this is a question of

15        Commissioner Scott.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.

17             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  On the last discussion you had

18        with Commissioner Connor about taking the list and

19        amending it, on a motion of any commissioner, the concern

20        is that currently under our rules ten members of the

21        commission can sponsor a public proposal and it will be

22        considered by committee.

23             If you have to amend your motion, that requires a

24        majority vote.  And so have we put people in a situation

25        who may want to amend this listing so that they have to


                     
 

			                                                                          37

1        get a majority?

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let me clarify.  I think I know

3        what you have in mind, Commissioner Scott.  If you adopt

4        these one by one, we are still going to go through these

5        section by section like they are in the calendar as we

6        noticed.  And at that point, Commissioner Connor, the one

7        that you want to pick, you can move it.  And it is already

8        there in the specific form.  It will go to the committee.

9        And we are going to do that regardless of how we go

10        anyway.  So that might answer some of the objections,

11        Commissioner Scott.

12             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  So the answer, Mr. Chairman,

13        is that we would not be amending Commissioner Mills' or

14        Commissioner Scott's motion requiring a majority vote, but

15        if you want to add an item it is ten votes --

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I understood what he was

17        proposing now that we go through your list and if they get

18        ten votes, that they be referred to committee as a public

19        proposal.  Like Article I, access to the courts regardless

20        of age, show of hands.  If it gets ten votes, it goes to

21        committee.  Then we go right down his list.

22             Then we revert to our order, which is to take this

23        calendar right here and I'll say, all right, we are going

24        to take up Article I, declaration of rights.  Does anybody

25        move for any of the public proposals?  If so, be


                     
 

			                                                                          38

1        recognized and we will take a vote.  If it gets ten votes,

2        that will go to committee too.

3             I think that would answer the objections that

4        Commissioner Connor was raising and I think you are

5        amenable to that; are you not?

6             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Yes, Mr. Chairman.  And at this

7        point I would join, if amendment is necessary as proposed

8        by Commissioner Mills, that we go ahead with the report

9        subject to the date change that Commissioner Freidin --

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I haven't even seen Commissioner

11        Evans standing over here very patiently and she wants to

12        speak.  So I don't want you to not get to speak.

13        Commissioner Evans.

14             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  It is a housekeeping question

15        having nothing to do with Commissioners Scott and Mills so

16        I'm perfectly willing to wait as long as you don't forget

17        me before a vote is taken.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let's wait and make a note and

19        make sure I recognize you when we are through.

20             Commissioner Barkdull, with what I outlined, if a

21        motion is made to that effect, would that meet the

22        commitment we made to the public that we are going to

23        consider each one of these?

24             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  In my view it would not,

25        Mr. Chairman.  And all I can do, Commissioner Scott, is to


                     
 

			                                                                          39

1        say I read what you say, I move that in lieu of a separate

2        motion on each issue submitted by the public --

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  But he is changing that.

4             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Well, that was not what I

5        understood a few minutes ago.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Wait a minute, let me go back to

7        Commissioner Mills who made a suggestion, in effect, that

8        I think Commissioner Scott was agreeable with.  He changed

9        that.  He is not making it in the form of a motion to do

10        that.

11             Commissioner Mills, would you like to attempt to make

12        what would be the motion?

13             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Let me try one more time.

14             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  That's not what we agreed to

15        do.

16             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  This is why it would be what we

17        agreed to do.  It actually would be possible at this point

18        to accept the motion of the rules committee to go through

19        each article separately -- this is slightly different than

20        what you described.

21             But go ahead and start with Article I, go through

22        Article I, take up the Scott concepts in Article I, then

23        go through the Barkdull report in Article I by detail so

24        we would know what we did in Article I.  And that means we

25        will have done everything.


                     
 

			                                                                          40

1             We will have fulfilled the idea of trying to

2        organize, which is as I understand Senator Scott's

3        principal thrust, and we will have fulfilled our

4        commitment to the public specifically because we will go

5        through every single proposal in Article I at the same

6        time we try to organize it by concept.  And I'm not sure

7        we even need a motion to do that.  If you want one, I'll

8        be glad to make it.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Evans-Jones, you are

10        on the rules committee, does that -- what is your response

11        to that, or what they are suggesting now?

12             Which is, again, let me explain the way I understand

13        it.  Let me see if we are all on the same page.  We are

14        going to -- if we adopt the rules committee report, we

15        will then have a motion, or whatever, by Commissioner

16        Scott that will successively and he can do it one by one,

17        or somebody can, vote on the 11, on the concepts that he

18        has got in each one of his proposals.

19             And at that point, when we finish that, we will

20        revert to the consideration of all of the public

21        proposals.  And what I was planning to do anyway was to

22        say, we are on Article I, declaration of rights.  Does any

23        commissioner move a public proposal under that article?

24             And then Commissioner Connor could move the specific

25        one that he wants to move, or two, and we would take a


                     
 

			                                                                          41

1        show of hands vote.  Reminding you that when you vote to

2        consider these, it doesn't mean you are for them, it means

3        you are willing to have them considered.

4             Am I right on the way I am interpreting this,

5        Commissioner Scott?  We could even do yours at the end,

6        but it would be simpler I think to do it in the beginning.

7             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  Mr. Chairman, it seems to

8        me that that would be an appropriate way to do it because

9        every commissioner would then have an opportunity to move

10        something within that specific article if he or she wants

11        to.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Commissioner

13        Barkdull?  Or, excuse me, Commissioner Smith, do you want

14        to speak first?  Would you yield or --

15             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I yield to Commissioner

16        Smith.

17             COMMISSIONER SMITH:  Well although we have taken an

18        hour and 23 minutes, I think this has been a very

19        important discussion we have had because this is the

20        people's constitution.  As we all know, we made a

21        commitment to the public to consider every proposal and I

22        think now we have a way that we can consider all the

23        proposals.

24             The most important thing that I have heard is the

25        fact that we can aggregate the various proposals.  Because


                     
 

			                                                                          42

1        if I were a member of an organization that spent four or

2        five meetings trying to come up with a particular

3        proposal, and I got three minutes in Tampa to speak, and

4        the subject matter of those proposals was just, because it

5        got nine votes was just knocked out, I would really have a

6        serious problem with that.

7             Now I think with the discussion of the rules

8        committee and with the discussion of this process, I

9        really believe we have a procedure now where we can meet

10        our commitment to discuss every proposal and yet not have

11        to reject, for instance, the issue of merit selection

12        versus judges.  Opt in or opt out, straight merit

13        selection, or election.  I mean, we can have that

14        aggregate issue submitted to the Article V committee and

15        deal with it and everybody will understand that we have

16        considered those proposals.

17             And then we can work out the details with the

18        specifically-drafted rule or constitutional change, and

19        with that, I have really benefited from this discussion

20        and I think we can move forward now and keep our

21        commitments.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Scott?

23             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Talking with the secretary, so

24        that we are clear, we are now not into having committee

25        proposals as such.  What we are saying is these subject


                     
 

			                                                                          43

1        matters will be actual proposals that would go to the

2        committee as a concept and then will be dealt with as a

3        proposal.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's correct.  It wouldn't be a

5        waiver of the rules, and it would go on the record this

6        way:  You take each one of these, we will vote on each

7        one, you will be listed as the person who sponsored the

8        public proposal concept of, and then if you get 11 votes

9        on those, or if we get 11 votes on those, ten, it will go

10        forward in that fashion to the committee.  And it will not

11        be a committee proposal when it comes out.

12             At the same time, when we go through the rest of

13        them, we will have specific proposals available on those

14        same concepts which will go to the committee.  And they

15        will be considered and the public will, public proposal

16        will be considered as a public proposal as well.

17             So that that way, we get in a way -- I'm glad we had

18        this discussion, because what Commissioner Scott has done

19        is made sure we get all the concepts up there but we also

20        get the specific proposals up there, which is what is

21        troubling a lot of commissioners and which I think was

22        basically troubling Commissioner Barkdull.  I'm not

23        overruling the chair of the rules committee.  I trust that

24        maybe we have reached a point here where we are all happy

25        and willing to go have a cup of coffee.


                     
 

			                                                                          44

1             Commissioner Alfonso?

2             COMMISSIONER ALFONSO:  Do we need a motion to

3        proceed?

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think that's what we are trying

5        to do.  Let me say what I would call for.  First, I would

6        call for a vote to adopt the rules committee.  Then I

7        would recognize Commissioner Scott as the first person and

8        he would go through his list one at a time and we will see

9        if they get ten votes.

10             When we finish that list, we will take up the

11        calendar and we will start with Article I, declaration of

12        rights, the ones that are listed there specifically, and

13        you will have an opportunity to move specific ones.

14             And if they get ten votes, they will go to committee.

15        And if I was voting, I can assure you that I would vote

16        for several of these specific ones even though I oppose

17        them because I think they should be considered and we had

18        public participation asking for them.  And I think that's

19        what's troubling you; wasn't it, Commissioner Connor?

20             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Yes, sir.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  I am going to ask you

22        to withdraw your amendment -- well, no, all right.  I

23        guess before we vote, if we sort of have a consensus on

24        that, then I'll move to Commissioner Zack's and Freidin's

25        and Evans had one too she wanted that would be


                     
 

			                                                                          45

1        housekeeping.

2             How do you want to proceed, Mr. Chairman?

3             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I want to know what

4        Commissioner Scott is going to do with his motion.  Is he

5        going it withdraw it or is he going to leave it up for

6        consideration?

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think we have an understanding

8        that he can withdraw it and bring it up after the report.

9        Is that agreeable to everybody?

10             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Well it is my understanding that

11        we were going to go with it as a part of this report that

12        these items would be considered --

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We'll treat it however you want

14        to.  Commissioner Mills, you made the definitive motion

15        here.

16             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Mr. Chairman, as I understand,

17        he can withdraw his motion to amend and as we go through

18        the report, which is to take up Article I, in Article I we

19        can take up Commissioner Scott's list.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I will do that if that is --

21             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  I don't think you need to do

22        anything procedurally other than to vote for the report.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Barnett.

24             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  This is a point of

25        clarification, Mr. Chairman.  Let's assume we go through


                     
 

			                                                                          46

1        the various proposals that have been submitted by the

2        public and they do not receive ten votes, does that mean

3        that, but the broad category, a broad category does, is

4        adopted by the commission, does that mean that those

5        proposals that received ten votes can be taken up by the

6        committee?  I'm not talking about individual members

7        filing that, but by the committee, or are the committees

8        in that prohibited since it didn't receive the commission

9        votes?

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  They are not prohibited, but the

11        committees can operate to come up with substitute

12        proposals from any one of these including the concept or

13        otherwise.  But under the rules they cannot offer a

14        committee proposal.  And to do otherwise would defeat our

15        open requirement, why these rules are so different.

16             So I would rule that if one of the concepts is

17        referred to the committee, that does not preclude

18        consideration of any specific language relating to that

19        concept, as by the committee.  By the same token, any

20        specific language that's proposed as a public proposal

21        will be written as a proposal and will have to be

22        considered on the specific language.

23             Now I think that's the way it would operate,

24        Commissioner Barnett.  And I believe that would be in

25        keeping with our commitment to the public.


                     
 

			                                                                          47

1             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  The question really is what if

2        it is rejected by the commission, there is not enough --

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  What, the concept?

4             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  The concept is rejected by the

5        commission.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It wouldn't prevent the

7        individuals from receiving 11 votes, the individual

8        proposals.  Or a commissioner can get up and file --

9             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  I'm not talking about a

10        commissioner filing it.  And I'm assuming that the

11        category concept of merit retention is referred to

12        committee, the committee.  What happens if specifics under

13        that have not received the ten votes, can the committee

14        then when they take it up, are they precluded then from

15        considering items that this commission, that have not

16        received sufficient votes in this commission and have not

17        been sponsored by a member?

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No, they are not precluded from

19        considering anything in the whole world.  It is kind of

20        like a judge wrote in a dissenting opinion one time, the

21        court would consider the Sears Roebuck catalog if it was

22        filed in a brief.  And that's sort of the way committees

23        have to operate, as they do in the Legislature.  Whatever

24        comes before that committee is going to be considered.

25        Commissioner Riley.


                     
 

			                                                                          48

1             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Mr. Chairman, in reference to

2        Commissioner Barnett's question I would encourage

3        commissioners who make the initial proposal to include

4        within that motion the pro, cons and anything that has to

5        do with that issue.  All within -- can they not do that?

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It would be out of order.  You

7        can do that in committee.  You just pass on the issue

8        that's before us.  If you start pro and conning, you can

9        do that later before the committee.

10             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  So if you have one issue that

11        has pros and cons within that article, you would have to

12        make two separate issues.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think everybody is

14        misunderstanding this.  If we go through and do these

15        concepts -- all right, let's take this one, access to the

16        courts regardless of age, it gets ten votes.  It is going

17        to be referred in that fashion to the committee.  All

18        right.

19             Then you come over here and there is one that has

20        specific language even that does the same thing.  It can

21        be sent as well.  Or if that one loses, access to the

22        courts regardless of age, doesn't get ten votes, the

23        specific item, when we go through that, if it does get ten

24        votes, will go to the committee.  If any commissioner

25        still wants to introduce it, they can do it before the


                     
 

			                                                                          49

1        drop dead date and it will go to the committee.

2             So there is no way that I conceive, and I think this

3        is in keeping with Commissioner Scott's real proposal,

4        that we do in fact consider these.  And then it meets

5        Commissioner Smith's very eloquent explanation that we are

6        going to take care of these people that came and gave us

7        these specific proposals by having the opportunity to move

8        them forward.  Is that a fair summary, Commissioner Scott?

9             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  (Nods affirmatively.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Barkdull.

11             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman, it appears that

12        we are on the motion of Commissioner Evans-Jones to

13        approve the report of the rules committee.  There has been

14        a motion by Senator Scott, as I understand it, to amend

15        that.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  He withdrew it.

17             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  The explanation -- has it

18        been withdrawn?

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes, sir.

20             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Then it is open for amendment

21        as proposed by Commissioner Freidin.  And Commissioner

22        Evans has something she wants to propose probably, I don't

23        know what it is, but something relating to the report.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let's get straight here.  I don't

25        want us to get mixed up any more than we have.  I sense


                     
 

			                                                                          50

1        that we have a consensus, we are going to go with my last

2        explanation.  I don't think we need a vote on that.  The

3        rules committee stays where it is.

4             Then there is specific items that Commissioner Zack

5        had on a date, Commissioner Evans has something similar,

6        Commissioner Freidin has something similar.  So now -- he

7        has withdrawn his motion and there will be no

8        double-crosses on this.  I understand that.  If there is

9        there will be guns fired from the rostrum.

10             (Laughter.)

11             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman --

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Have you got one too?

13             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  No, if I could state, and I

14        think we may save some time, that the rules committee will

15        accept, unless somebody indicates an objection here on the

16        floor, what has been suggested by Commissioner Zack that

17        we start at 9:00 rather than noon on that date.  And if

18        that, no objection on that, and we change the deadline

19        date that Commissioner Freidin wants from the 6th to the

20        13th.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Now we will hear from

22        Commissioner Evans.

23             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Now we will hear what

24        Commissioner Evans wants.

25             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  Okay.  My concern is the Sunday


                     
 

			                                                                          51

1        meetings.  And in particular, the one meeting that leads

2        into, that includes activities that lead into Holy Week.

3        And that's the March 29th probable meeting.  My concern is

4        do I, if the committee votes, and there is some kind of

5        vote on that day, do I have to choose between my prior

6        commitment to the service to my church, and my commitment

7        to the state?

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'll tell you what, we are not

9        going to have any meetings on Easter.

10             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  No, that's not Easter, that's

11        two weeks prior but it includes First Communion, which

12        leads into Holy Week.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I don't want to interfere with

14        anybody's religious activities.  In fact, we originally

15        had something set that was in a High Holy holiday for the

16        Jewish religion and we changed that when it was called to

17        my attention by one of the commissioners who had to be

18        somewhere by 6:00 or whatever on Friday afternoon.  And we

19        will accommodate the religious situation as it is raised.

20        And that is a probable that's listed on there and I can

21        tell you now that if just won't happen.

22             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  Okay, thank you.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Scott.

24             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  On that point, we discussed this

25        yesterday.  The schedule of what we do regarding, for


                     
 

			                                                                          52

1        example, public hearings, whether we have any or how many

2        and all of that is still subject to discussion and debate.

3        What we are doing here basically is fixing our schedule

4        for the next few months.

5             But I want to assure you that this still has on it,

6        for example, that we will meet the weekend that the

7        legislative session is over.  And that's not going to

8        happen.  The Senate president said that that's not going

9        to happen because the staff will be almost half dead by

10        then.

11             SECRETARY BLANTON:  Maybe dead.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Actually the calendar from

13        January on is probable.  Commissioner Barkdull.

14             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  That's a correct explanation

15        of it.  It is not set in cement.  It is just so people

16        have an opportunity to mark their calendars off and we

17        will work on the dates as we get closer to them.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The amendment that you offered on

19        Commissioner Zack is that, or accepted, is that we meet on

20        October the 20th at 9:00 a.m., we convene here.  And we

21        will end at the close of business on October 23rd, or

22        whenever we end that week; is that right?

23             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  That's correct.

24             Mr. Chairman, I'd like to conform the rest of the

25        schedule to the same kind of principles we just talked


                     
 

			                                                                          53

1        about where we come in the night before.  What you have us

2        doing is starting at 1:00 and ending at 1:00 and turning

3        into a three-day meeting what could easily be a two-day

4        meeting, if we started at 9:00 a.m., come in the night

5        before, work late that night and then finish late if

6        necessary the second day.  And I think that would resolve

7        many issues for many people in this chamber and still

8        allow us to do the work effectively.

9             And what I mean specifically is we come in the night

10        of the 11th, start at 9:00 a.m. on the 12th, work late on

11        the 12th, and finish on the 13th.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The simple way to handle that,

13        those are committee meetings.  And the session meeting

14        will be on the 13th and 14th.  So I think we could safely

15        say that the committee meetings could be at the call of

16        the chair of the committee on that date.

17             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  So these can be changed by the

18        committee without this group taking action.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Correct.

20             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  And you raise a good point

21        because we have two groups of committees.  And if we are

22        going to have both of them meeting on the same day, they

23        are going to have to meet in the morning and the afternoon

24        in order probably to accomplish that.  So with that

25        amendment -- it's part of your amendment; is that correct?


                     
 

			                                                                          54

1             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I'll accept that we come in

2        at 9:00 as he indicates, but I don't want to cut a day off

3        at this time.  If we happen to get through, fine, but I

4        don't want to cut the days off because --

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  This wouldn't because there is a

6        commission meeting scheduled the next morning and the next

7        day.

8             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I understand what you are

9        saying, Mr. Chairman, but I want the commissioners to

10        understand that we have got to spend some time on these

11        items and we need to have your calendars blocked out

12        because we might not get through.  And I don't mind coming

13        earlier or any day, but I don't want to take a day off the

14        back at this point.

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  One thing about it, we can change

16        the next meeting with a two thirds vote if we want to.

17        Now where are we?

18             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Evans-Jones' motion to

19        approve the report as amended.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor say aye.

21             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Opposed?

23             (No response.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It carries.  Now senator --

25        excuse me, I'm going to make you a commissioner yet,


                     
 

			                                                                          55

1        Commissioner Mathis.

2             COMMISSIONER MATHIS:  I have one clarification about

3        the calendar that's just a matter of housekeeping.

4        Although Commissioner Henderson might want us to think

5        that the FAMU-Bethune Cookman game is in Daytona Beach, it

6        is not, it is in Orlando, Florida.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  And Disney is helping out I read

8        somewhere, too.  That's going to be a great weekend for

9        people in Orlando.  All right.  I'm ready to get going

10        here if everybody else is.

11             Commissioner Nabors, not on the same subject I hope.

12             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  Bear with me one second, I'm a

13        little slow.  I want to make sure I understand, I'm very

14        comfortable with where we are, but let me give you an

15        example.  Let's say that Mr. Scott, the access to the

16        courts regardless of age is presented and gets 20 votes,

17        and then there is no individual member proposal on that

18        and no specific proposal moved, that means that concept

19        will be drafted as a concept by staff and working that

20        committee; is that right?

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We will work that out, but that's

22        basically correct.  And then we will see what specific

23        proposals get the necessary votes, too.  Because that will

24        enter into what we need to draft.  Is that the way you see

25        it, Commissioner Scott?  That's what you are trying to


                     
 

			                                                                          56

1        accomplish is make sure we get the concept and form in

2        there.

3             And I think this is something we can handle,

4        Commissioner Nabors.  If anybody has suggestions after it

5        is done we can handle that, too.  You can also introduce

6        one, Commissioner Nabors.

7             All right.  Let's get going.  I guess the first thing

8        we are going to do under that, accepting that report,

9        would be to take up each item that has been offered.  Now

10        I can do this one of two ways, tell me your wish.  We can

11        go through Article I, and go through that list and then I

12        can revert to Article I that's in the calendar.  And we

13        will conclude with Article I and go through it orderly in

14        that manner.  All right.

15             So we are going to start off with the first Article

16        I, declaration of rights.  And Commissioner Scott moves

17        for the public concept of access to the courts regardless

18        of age.  All right.  All that want to refer that or move

19        it forward, raise your hand.

20             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It receives a sufficient number

22        of votes, it will move forward.

23             Equality based on gender, age or sexual preference.

24        All that want to send that concept forward raise your

25        hand.


                     
 

			                                                                          57

1             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It receives enough votes.

3             Right of privacy versus parental authority.  All that

4        want to send that concept forward, raise your hand.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Barely, it does carry forward.

7        The affirmative action, the general subject of affirmative

8        action.

9             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does.

11             Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court relating to the

12        fourth amendment.

13             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

15             Limitations on forfeiture of property.

16             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

18             Private property rights.

19             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.  Now, we will

21        revert here to the calendars, it is probably the easiest.

22        You can work off of both if you want a little more detail,

23        but we can work off the calendar because it is easier to

24        use I think.  Does everybody have that?  Okay.  It is on

25        your desk.


                     
 

			                                                                          58

1             We will start with Article I and we can do it one of

2        two ways.  I can say does any member move I-2-1?

3             (No response.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Does any member move I-2-1a?

5             (No response.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Does any member want to move to

7        include the protection of the unborn?  Any member can

8        introduce this even if it doesn't get the vote.  It does

9        not get the vote on this particular item.

10             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  May I be recognized?

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Certainly.

12             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Mr. Chairman, that's not the

13        way I understood it.  It was understood that Commissioner

14        Connor was going to, was going to sponsor it and now if

15        you would call for the ten supporting votes.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  He did sponsor it.

17             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  I understand, but I didn't

18        raise my hand because --

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We will take another vote.

20             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Sir, Mr. Chairman, you only

21        asked who is going to sponsor it.  Mr. Connor is

22        sponsoring it.  Now may we vote for the ten supporting

23        votes?

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You are going to move it, right?

25             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Yes, sir.


                     
 

			                                                                          59

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Connor moves it.

2        Now, all that are in favor of this going forward for

3        consideration, raise your hand.

4             COMMISSIONER SMITH:  I have a question.  Can we say

5        anything about it or not?

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well we have it under the report,

7        but we would have no debate.  I don't want to cut anybody

8        off.  I think the sponsor or the movant certainly could

9        have some, just short explanation of why he moved it --

10             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman --

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  -- without objection.

12             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Yes, sir.  If it would be

13        helpful I am prepared to move a group of proposals that I

14        would put under the rubric of sanctity of life matters for

15        consideration.  That would range from abortion to

16        euthanasia, if that would be helpful.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think it might not be helpful

18        at this point because you can introduce those at any time

19        and they don't need ten votes.  Now we are going to vote

20        one more time on Commissioner Connor's proposal that the

21        public include protection of the unborn be considered and

22        moved forward to the committee.  All those in favor of

23        moving that forward, raise your hand.

24             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'll be ten.


                     
 

			                                                                          60

1             Protect life from conception through natural death,

2        I-2-1c.  That's sort of the same.  You move it,

3        Commissioner Evans moves it.  All in favor of moving that

4        forward in that form, raise your hand.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It fails.  Not that it fails, she

7        could still introduce it.

8             Add provision to Article I, Section 2, as follows:

9        "The rights of persons under 18 years of age shall

10        include, but not be limited to, all the fundamental rights

11        of this article unless specifically precluded by laws

12        which enhance the protection of such persons."  I-2-2,

13        does anybody move that?

14             (No response.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, we will move on.

16        I-2-3, amend Article I, Section 2, to read, "No person

17        shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion,

18        gender, sexual orientation or physical handicap."

19             You move it?  Commissioner Riley moves it.  I do have

20        a reading clerk who is better than me.  All in favor of

21        moving that forward as moved by Commissioner Riley, raise

22        your hand.  That's I-2-3.  Everybody raise your hand

23        again, let me see what we have got here.

24             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It passes, it goes forward.


                     
 

			                                                                          61

1        Commissioner Scott.

2             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, I thought, and

3        members here agree with me, that we were not going to go

4        through and read out every single proposal, but rather we

5        would ask under Article I, section whatever, does any --

6        is there any proposal that a commissioner wishes to move.

7        And that's what, my understanding of what our procedure

8        was going to be.  Am I right about that, Judge?

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I was going to do that until we

10        got this concept amendment.

11             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  That's my understanding but I

12        think the Chair changed my mind earlier on in the

13        discussions.

14             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Well I would --

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We can get through this in just a

16        minute.

17             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Yeah, but I think the idea was

18        we would have these concepts and then ask if any member

19        wishes to move any one of these and not put out every

20        single one and have them specifically rejected, which is

21        Commissioner Smith's point.  So I would urge that the

22        procedure be that we ask if there is any commissioner who

23        wishes to move any item under Article I, section whatever.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  I'm going to go

25        forward, in the absence of being overruled, with the way


                     
 

			                                                                          62

1        we are doing it, because I don't think that failure to

2        receive the ten votes precludes it from being considered

3        under the concept anyway.

4             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  Mr. Chairman, I have a point of

5        information.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Zack.

7             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  I am thoroughly confused at this

8        time, and maybe I am the only one.  But the right of

9        privacy versus parental authority, which is what we

10        adopted as a overall discussion area, I thought included,

11        for example, what Mr. Connor specifically moved.  So it

12        seems to me like we are just undoing precisely what we

13        thought we were doing.  Am I missing something?

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yeah, I think you are missing the

15        point that some commissioners don't feel that way and they

16        want to make these specifically.

17             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  I'm not sure, Mr. Chairman, that,

18        for example, Mr. Connor -- and I may ask Mr. Connor the

19        question, if I might.  Do you feel it is necessary to make

20        a specific motion as to I-2-2 now that the general matter

21        which is contained under right of privacy versus parental

22        authority has been adopted by the group?

23             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  I did, which is why I moved it

24        because of my concern about the scope within which it

25        would be interpreted.  And it is why, in the interest of


                     
 

			                                                                          63

1        economizing our time, I had suggested that I be permitted

2        to move a group, which may or may not survive the ten

3        person vote, but which would be without prejudice, as I

4        understand it, to file an individual proposal.  But I

5        thought in moving -- if I had understood the intent of the

6        Chair to go through this, I thought by aggregating

7        proposals --

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The point is well-taken,

9        Commissioner Zack, Commissioner Scott, Commissioner

10        Everybody Else.  You-all have an opportunity to move any

11        of these.  And what I'm going to do, rather than go

12        through each one, is say, under Article I, declaration of

13        rights, you have reviewed or have the opportunity to

14        review the specific proposals offered by the public.  Does

15        anyone move under Article I, Section 2, any of the

16        proposals?  Now I'll give you time to look at those

17        proposals and any member may move any one of them.  We

18        won't go through them one at a time.  I was going to use

19        my reading clerk.

20             We have had the two so we don't have to worry about

21        that.  Do you move one, Commissioner Langley?

22             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  No, Mr. Chairman, but I think

23        there should be an announcement by the Chair that you feel

24        this is already included so we are not per se rejecting

25        these.


                     
 

			                                                                          64

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I don't think we are rejecting

2        anything.

3             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  But we are saying that they

4        are not moving because they are already included in what

5        we did.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I don't think that the failure to

7        move these amounts to a rejection of the item that is not

8        moved.  But to make sure that it is considered in the form

9        that it is listed here, you have got to move it.  Is that

10        clear?  You get a specific proposal drafted which will go

11        to the committee, and if you want it in this specific

12        form, which is what Commissioner Connor was making sure

13        that he had, then, fine.  But you need to pick them out

14        one at a time and move them, if you want to.

15             Now that's pretty clear.

16             We got through I-2-3.  So we are starting with I-2-3a

17        and going through I-2-9.  If anyone wants to move any one

18        of those, we do them one at a time now.  Any one of those,

19        move them.  Commissioner Sundberg.

20             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman.

21        Have you passed over I-2-7?

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No.  We haven't passed over

23        anything in Article I other than we have passed over I --

24        everything between I-2-1 and I-2-3.  We are now on I-2-3a

25        through I-2-9.  And anybody can move any one of those.


                     
 

			                                                                          65

1        Commissioner Freidin.

2             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  Mr. Chairman, I move I-2-3a.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I-2-3a has been membered.  Would

4        you read that, Reading Clerk?

5             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 2-3a, "Amend

6        Article I, Section 2, to read:  No person shall be

7        deprived of any right because of race, religion, gender,

8        or physical handicap."

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Now everybody that's

10        in favor of moving that forward, which adds the word

11        "gender" to that provision as it exists today, raise your

12        hand.

13             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It is moved forward.

15             All right.  Anybody want to move one, any other of

16        the items between I-2-3b through I-2-9?

17             Commissioner Freidin.

18             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  Mr. Chairman, I'd like to move

19        I-2-3b.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Move I-2-3b.  Read please.

21             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 2-3b, "Amend

22        Article I, Section 2, striking the word 'handicap' and

23        substituting the word 'disability' to conform with the

24        Americans with Disabilities Act."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Everybody in favor of that, raise


                     
 

			                                                                          66

1        your hand, moving it forward.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It passed, goes.

4             All right, Commissioner Sundberg.

5             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  Mr. Chairman, unless there is

6        a ruling of the Chair that it has already been included

7        within the concept of affirmative action, I would like to

8        move I-2-7.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Commissioner Sundberg

10        has moved I-2-7, read.

11             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 2-7, "Add the

12        following:  The citizens of the state of Florida shall

13        enjoy equal opportunity to employment, housing, public

14        accommodations, public education --"

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You can dispense with the

16        reading.  Is everybody familiar with that one?  All in

17        favor, raise your hand.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  It passes.  Alternates

20        can't vote.  Okay.  Does anybody move any of the other

21        items under Article I-2?

22             Commissioner Zack.

23             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  Yes, I'd like to move

24        specifically I-2-1, which I think ought to be incorporated

25        in access to courts regardless of age, but in view of the


                     
 

			                                                                          67

1        procedure that we are going to follow, I'll specifically

2        move that matter.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of I -- read it.

4             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 2-1, "Amend

5        Article I, Section 2, in pertinent part to read:  No

6        person shall be deprived of any right because of race,

7        religion, age or physical handicap."

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand.

9             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.  Any more under

11        I-2, under Article I?

12             (No response.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Now we move to Article I, Section

14        3.  Read the article -- no, does anybody move any of

15        those?  Have time to look them over.

16             Commissioner Evans.

17             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  Mr. Chairman, I move Article

18        I-3-1.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Commissioner Evans --

20        read please.

21             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 3-1, "Add to

22        Article I, Section 3, the compelling state interest test.

23        That is, laws affecting the free exercise clause should be

24        subject to strict scrutiny."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that


                     
 

			                                                                          68

1        forward, raise your hand.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not pass.  Do you have

4        another one?

5             Commissioner Evans.

6             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  Mr. Chairman, I move Article I,

7        Section 3-2.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article I, Section 3-2, read.

9             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 3-2, "Modify the

10        language in Article I, Section 3, regarding 'indirect aid

11        to sectarian institutions' to ensure that the provision is

12        not interpreted to prevent students in parochial schools

13        from receiving neutral benefits."

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand if

15        you want to move it forward.

16             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not move.  Any more?  Any

18        more under Article I-3?

19             (No response.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I want to wait and make sure

21        everybody has read it.

22             Are we ready to move?  Move to Article I, Section 4.

23             (Pause.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Anybody want to move either one

25        of those two public proposals?


                     
 

			                                                                          69

1             (No response.)

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  The train has left.

3             Article I, Section 5.  Does anyone move Article I

4        Section 5?

5             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  So moved.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It is moved by Commissioners

7        Connor and Riley.  Read.

8             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 5-1, "Amend

9        Article I, Section 5, to read:  Rights to assemble and

10        associate.  The people shall have the right peaceably to

11        assemble --"

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's all right.  I think

13        everyone has read that.  You know what we are voting on.

14        If you are for moving that forward, raise your hand.

15             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let's vote again.  Everybody get

17        their hands up.  We are right on the border here.

18             It does go forward.

19             All right, Article I, Section 6.  Let's study those

20        for just a few minutes.

21             (Pause.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We are ready to

23        proceed under Section 6.  Does anybody move any of these?

24             Commissioner Riley.

25             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I move Article I, Section 6-2.


                     
 

			                                                                          70

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read Article I, Section 6-2.

2             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 6-2, "All

3        Floridians shall have the right to join labor unions and

4        to bargain collectively.  It shall be a felony to coerce,

5        intimidate or threaten employees because of union advocacy

6        or membership."

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

8        forward, raise your hand.

9             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not go forward.  Are

11        there any others under Article I, Section 6?

12             (No response.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Anybody move any under Article I,

14        Section 6?  Okay.

15             If not, we will move to Section 8.  That one is

16        pretty short.  Anybody move Section 8?

17             (No response.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, we will move on.

19        Article I, Section 9.

20             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  I'll move --

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Sundberg.

22             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  -- I would like to move

23        Article I-9-1 for that proposal.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read please.

25             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 9-1,  "Amend


                     
 

			                                                                          71

1        Article I, Section 9, to read:  No person shall be

2        deprived of life, liberty or property without due process

3        of law, or be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense

4        or be compelled in any criminal matter to be a witness

5        against himself.  Private property may be forfeited only

6        after felony conviction of, and exhaustion of appeals by,

7        the property owner."

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

9        moving that forward, raise your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

12             Article I, Section 12.  Anybody move Article I

13        Section 12?

14             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I move proposal I-12-1.

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that one,

16        raise your hand.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It fails.

19             Article I, Section 15.  This one includes the death

20        penalty.  All right.  Does anyone move anything under

21        Article I, Section 15?  Hearing none -- oh, Commissioner

22        Barnett.

23             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  I move I-15-a-1b.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read please.

25             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 15-a-1b, "Add


                     
 

			                                                                          72

1        language to protect against the death penalty being

2        imposed arbitrarily and capriciously.  Imposition of the

3        death penalty should require a unanimous jury

4        recommendation for death."

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

6        moving that forward, raise your hand.

7             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.  Any others

9        under that section, Section 15?

10             (No response.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Section 16.

12             (No response.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Section 17, anybody move Article

14        I, Section 17?

15             (No response.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Section 18, anybody move Section

17        18?

18             Commissioner Langley moves Section I-18-1.  All in

19        favor of moving that forward, raise your hand.

20             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay, it moves forward.  That's

22        one that probably wasn't covered under the concept, too.

23        Okay.  I didn't let him read that time, but it was short.

24             I-19-1 -- yeah, go ahead and read it so it will be in

25        the record.


                     
 

			                                                                          73

1             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 18-1, "Amend

2        Article I, Section 18, to read:  "No administrative

3        agency, except the Department of Military Affairs in an

4        appropriately convened court-martial action, shall impose

5        a sentence of imprisonment, nor shall it impose any other

6        penalty except as provided by law."

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Section 19, Article I.

8        Commissioners Riley and Connor move.  Which one?  Which

9        one are you moving?

10             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I-19-1.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read please.

12             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 19-1, "Amend

13        Article I, Section 19 to read:  "No person charged with a

14        crime shall be compelled to pay costs before a judgment of

15        conviction has become final.  A person not found guilty of

16        a crime shall not be assessed fees or costs to recover

17        property seized as evidence or otherwise held, impounded

18        or stored by the government."

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that one

20        forward, raise your hand.

21             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

23             Any more under Article I, Section 19?

24             (No response.)

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, Article I, Section 21.


                     
 

			                                                                          74

1             Commissioner Freidin moves.  Read please.

2             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  Article I-21-1.

3             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 21-1, "Amend

4        Article I, Section 21 to read:  The courts shall be open

5        to every person for redress of any injury, without regard

6        to the age of the litigants, and justice shall be

7        administered without sale, denial or delay."

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

9        moving that forward, raise your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

12             Article I, we are still there, on Article I, Section

13        21.  There are two others.  Does anybody move either of

14        them?

15             (No response.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article I, Section 22.

17        Commissioner Rundle.

18             COMMISSIONER RUNDLE:  I'd like to move I-22-7.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it.

20             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 22-7, "Add:  A

21        putative father in a paternity suit does not have the

22        right to trial by jury."

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

24        forward, raise your hand.

25             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)


                     
 

			                                                                          75

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We did get ten so it goes.

2             Any more under I, Section I-22?

3             Commissioner Freidin.

4             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  I-22-2.

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read please.

6             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 22-2, "Amend

7        Article I, Section 22, to read:  The right of trial by

8        jury shall be secure to all and remain inviolate without

9        regard to the age of the litigants.  The qualifications

10        and the number of jurors, not fewer than six, shall be

11        fixed by law."

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, Commissioner Freidin

13        moved.  All in favor of moving that forward, raise your

14        hand.

15             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not move forward.

17             Any more under Section 22?

18             (No response.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article I, Section 23.  There is

20        a lot of these if you want to take a little more time.

21             Commissioner Zack.

22             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  Move I-23-11.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Please read.

24             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 23-11, "Prohibit

25        the sale of personal data on individuals from databases


                     
 

			                                                                          76

1        without written consent of the concerned individual."

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

3        forward, raise your hand.

4             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it.  Zack, you picked a

6        winner, Commissioner Zack.

7             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  Mr. Chairman, thank you.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Anybody got any others under

9        I-23?

10             Commissioner Mathis.

11             COMMISSIONER MATHIS:  I move I-23-2.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I-23-2, read please.

13             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 23-2, "The right

14        of privacy should not extend to the right to abortion."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

16        forward, raise your hand.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Eight.

19             Any more under Article I, 23?

20             Commissioner West.

21             COMMISSIONER WEST:  I would like to move I-23-3.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I-23-3, please read.

23             READING CLERK:  Article 1, Section 23-3,

24        "Constitution should require parental consent for minors

25        to obtain an abortion."


                     
 

			                                                                          77

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those that want to move that

2        forward, raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Raise your hands again.  I

5        thought I counted ten.

6             SECRETARY BLANTON:  I get nine, three times.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I was wrong.

8             All right.  Anybody want to move any of the others

9        under I-23?

10             Commissioner Morsani had his hand up and I'll get to

11        you next, Commissioner Evans.  Commissioner Morsani.

12             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  Mr. Chairman, I-23-11a, and

13        maybe that was covered in I-23-11.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, we can go ahead and go

15        since it is a specific public proposal.  Let's read it and

16        we will vote on it.

17             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 23-11a, "Expand

18        the privacy provision as it relates to information that

19        can be obtained from computers."

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

21        forward, raise your hand.

22             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

24             Commissioner Evans was next.

25             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  I move I-23-5a.


                     
 

			                                                                          78

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Please read.

2             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 23-5a, "Include a

3        provision to affirm parental rights and responsibilities

4        to direct the upbringing of their own children."

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Oh, 5a, excuse me, all right.

6        Did I interrupt you or do you want to hear it again?

7        Include a provision to affirm parental rights and

8        responsibilities to direct the upbringing of their own

9        children.  All that want to move that forward, raise your

10        hand.

11             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  It does not go forward.

13             Any more under I-23?

14             Commissioner Connor?

15             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  1-23-5b, but I believe that

16        there is an error in the summary.  I believe it should be

17        included but not limited to.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's probably correct.  Read it

19        with that change in it, if you would, sir.

20             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 23-5b, "Restore

21        the right of parents to make decisions for their children,

22        including, but not limited to, abortions."

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think that's the way it was

24        presented.  All those in -- yeah.

25             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  For the record, I for one want


                     
 

			                                                                          79

1        to make the statement here that we adopted as general

2        categories on this one and several others, I don't mean to

3        just pick this one, that are covered in what we first

4        adopted.  And so I for one do not consider it necessary to

5        re-adopt it.  I just think that point should be made if we

6        are going to go through this.

7             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  I'll accept that.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think that's been made and

9        people still want to introduce them.  And I think that's

10        fine.  They have a right to.

11             Anybody else under I-23?  Any other proposals under

12        I-23?

13             Commissioner Connor.  Commissioner Evans-Jones,

14        you'll be next.

15             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I believe that --

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We need to vote on that.

17             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  I withdrew it in view of the

18        statement.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Evans-Jones -- oh,

20        do you want to make another one?

21             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Yes, sir.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Go ahead.

23             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I'd like to move

24        I-23-1, which was the proposal, you may recall, by

25        Mr. Horkin in Gainesville, although I believe, frankly,


                     
 

			                                                                          80

1        that that summary is not a quite fair summary.  I think it

2        probably could more fairly be summarized to say that

3        Mr. Horkin favored a provision which would bar Florida

4        courts from construing -- or which would require Florida

5        courts to construe the privacy provision in conformity

6        with the privacy decisions of the United States Supreme

7        Court.  I think that's probably a more fair summary of

8        what he had proposed.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Do you move that as you have --

10             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  I move it.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  -- as you have revised it?  Did

12        you get the revision?

13             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  It is his proposal, I don't

14        care how it is summarized, I just wanted to add that.

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  You weren't revising it.

16        All in favor -- do you want to vote on that?  Everybody

17        that wants to move that forward, please raise your hand.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  It doesn't go forward

20        in that form.

21             Any more under I-23?  Commissioner Evans-Jones.

22             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  I-23-4.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Please read.

24             READING CLERK:  Article I, Section 23-4, "Require

25        parental consent for minors in all medical procedures."


                     
 

			                                                                          81

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

2        moving that forward, raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not go forward.  Any more

5        under I-23?

6             (No response.)

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move to I-24

8        and give you a few minutes to read -- well, it is just

9        two, three -- two.  Anybody move either one of those?

10             (No response.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  We will move forward to

12        I-25.  Well we had better find out what Article I, Section

13        25, is since somebody wants to repeal it.  I'm sure

14        Commissioner Barkdull can recite it off the top of his

15        head.  Does anybody know what it is without looking it up?

16             COMMISSIONER BROCHIN:  Taxpayer bill of rights.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Taxpayer bill of rights.  There

18        is a proposal that it should be repealed or add something

19        to it.

20             After the hearings in Washington, though, I don't

21        know if it would do any good to add anything to it or not.

22        Let's move on to Article I, Section --

23             SECRETARY BLANTON:  No section.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  -- no section.  These are ones

25        that aren't in a section.  These are proposals that would


                     
 

			                                                                          82

1        fit in Article I.  Take a minute and read them.

2             Incidentally, while you are reading it, we are going

3        to have lunch brought in and we are going to eat at 12:30.

4        We will eat in the back in the lounge back here.

5             These are some weighty ones here.  These don't have

6        an assigned section.

7             Commissioner Barnett.

8             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  Commissioner Kogan had just

9        suggested that I do I-10, but we were discussing the

10        merits of it and you passed it by before I had a chance.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Certainly you qualify as a

12        subject we would all like to visit there, along with

13        Justice Kogan at the other end of the beach.

14             (Laughter.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Riley?

16             I'm teasing, Martha.

17             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I sincerely hope so,

18        Mr. Chairman.

19             I'd like to move forward I-x-3.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I-x-3, would you read, please?

21             READING CLERK:  Article I-x-3, "Create a Bill of

22        Rights for Children.  Replace the concept that keeping the

23        family together is the best policy, notwithstanding the

24        family's dysfunction."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Everybody that wants


                     
 

			                                                                          83

1        to move that forward, raise your hand.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not go.  Any others?

4             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  I'll move I-x-1, Mr. Chairman.

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Connor moves I-x-1.

6        Read it please.

7             READING CLERK:  Article I-x-1, "Add a Freedom of

8        Conscience Amendment:  No person shall be directly

9        compelled to support or endorse any cause, charity,

10        purpose, or organization, financially or otherwise, or

11        indirectly to do so as a condition upon the receipt of a

12        public benefit or the exercise of a public privilege or

13        right, except in the payment of taxes enacted pursuant to

14        general law or as a penalty imposed by a court for the

15        commission of a crime."

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

17        moving that forward, raise your hand please.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It fails.

20             Next one?  Anybody else under the x?

21             Commissioner Rundle.

22             COMMISSIONER RUNDLE:  I'd like to move I-x-16.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I-x-16.  Read it please.

24             READING CLERK:  Article I-x-16, "Criminals must serve

25        at least 85 percent of their time."


                     
 

			                                                                          84

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

2        forward, please raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Get them up.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Ten, it goes forward.

7             Commissioner Riley.

8             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to move forward

9        I-x-14a.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it please.

11             READING CLERK:  Article I-x-14a, "Allow the use of

12        marijuana for medical purposes.  Allow physicians to

13        prescribe cannabis to certified patients."

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand.

15             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

17             Commissioner Zack.

18             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  I'd like to move I-x-18a.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I-x-18a, read it please.

20             READING CLERK:  Article I-x-18a, "Provide all

21        children medical care, no matter what their means are."

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand.

23             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

25             Commissioner Evans.


                     
 

			                                                                          85

1             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  I move I-x-15.

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I-x-15, read please.

3             READING CLERK:  Article I-x-15, "An inmate shall lose

4        all reductions of sentence upon a finding by a petit jury

5        of the filing of a frivolous lawsuit."

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand.

7             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not go forward.

9             Any more under x?

10             (No response.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  There being no more,

12        we will move to Article II, general provisions, and begin

13        with Article II, Section 2.

14             Commissioner Scott.

15             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, we have listed as

16        a general category the environmental bill of rights issue

17        that we heard a lot of discussion on.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Excuse me, we need to go through

19        your -- I'll go through them right now.  I didn't start at

20        the right place.  Senator Scott -- Commissioner Scott is

21        correct.

22             Article II, general provisions, an environmental bill

23        of rights.  All in favor of going forward on the

24        environmental bill of rights, raise your hand.

25             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)


                     
 

			                                                                          86

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

2             The Ethics Commission.  I think there was a specific

3        provision.

4             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  There is a specific provision so

5        we will just withdraw that.  And I assume somebody is

6        going to move it.  This is one that some commissioners

7        wanted.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It is not on this list, but we

9        had it proposed.  At one of the later ones, if somebody

10        wants to move it, we can go ahead and deal with it if

11        you'd like to.

12             Commissioner Scott, under your proposal, there was a

13        proposal, as I recall it, to create an Ethics Commission

14        that would be -- consider all the things that involved

15        ethics for every branch of government.  Wasn't that it?

16             Commissioner Zack, who was chairman of the Ethics

17        Commission as it now exists.

18             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  I would like to have that in

19        there as a general provision because there are a number of

20        issues involving the Ethics Commission that aren't

21        addressed specifically but they were touched on in a

22        number of our hearings.  So I think it would be

23        appropriate.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving the Ethics

25        Commission title forward.


                     
 

			                                                                          87

1             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

3             Now we will revert to Article II, Section 3.  Does

4        anybody want to move -- excuse me, Article II, Section 2.

5        Does anybody want to move those two, any one of those two?

6             Commissioner Rundle.

7             COMMISSIONER RUNDLE:  Mr. Chair, we find II-2-2 very

8        entertaining.

9             (Laughter.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor -- read it, read it,

11        read it.

12             READING CLERK:  Article II, Section 2-2, "Lawyers

13        should be removed from elective office in the legislative

14        and executive branches of government."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I don't know why they didn't

16        include judicial in that.  Let's make it universal.  Okay.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay, it fails.  That's right, we

19        have that one in Article V; don't we?

20             Article II, Section 5.

21             Does anybody want to move that?  If not, we'll go to

22        Article II, Section 6.

23             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  I'll move that on behalf of

24        the Department of Community Affairs.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  II-6.  Would you read it please?


                     
 

			                                                                          88

1             READING CLERK:  Article II, Section 6-1, "Add the

2        following section:  It shall be the policy of this state

3        to protect the safety of persons and property from natural

4        and nonnatural disasters.  Adequate provision shall be

5        made by law to provide incentives to ensure this measure

6        of health, safety and welfare protection for all persons

7        and property."

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor, raise

9        your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, six.

12             Move to the Article II, Section 7.  There are a lot

13        of those.

14             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  Mr. Chairman, there is no

15        need to move any of the specifics there under the bill of

16        rights since we have adopted it as a concept.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's correct.  If you want to

18        move the specific one, all right, but if you don't, we

19        have got it already.

20             Commissioner Mills.

21             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Just to clarify, I guess Article

22        II, Section 7-x-3, would simply be a process issue, if you

23        have an environmental bill of rights.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No, I think what this says is

25        create a whole new article for the natural resources.


                     
 

			                                                                          89

1             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  It doesn't have that content, it

2        is just a process issue.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, don't move it then.

4             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  I won't.  Thank you.

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Any more under 11-7 [sic]?

6             (No response.)

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Anybody move any under 11-7

8        [sic]?

9             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Two, Article II.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Excuse me, Article II, 11.  I'm

11        getting punchy.  We're going to have to take a recess here

12        to get me back in order.  Nobody moves, okay.

13             Article II, Section 10.

14             READING CLERK:  Section 8.

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Eight.  I really got bemused by

16        Commissioners Barnett and Kogan.  I keep visualizing that,

17        Commissioner Kogan.

18             All right, Commissioner Mills.  I have had enough

19        nonsense.

20             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  I move Article II, Section

21        8-f-1.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  8-f-1, go ahead.

23             READING CLERK:  Article II, Section 8-f-1, "Authorize

24        the Ethics Commission to initiate investigations (i.e.,

25        'primary' investigations)."


                     
 

			                                                                          90

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

2        forward, raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it, it moves forward.  Any

5        more under Section 8?

6             Commissioner Barnett.

7             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  I'd like to move II-8-a-1.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  II-8-a-1, read please.

9             READING CLERK:  Article II, Section 8-a-1, "Article

10        II, Section 8(a), requiring full and public financial

11        disclosure by elected constitutional officers, should be

12        amended to include all elected officials in the state.

13        This would pick up elected municipal officers and officers

14        of special districts."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

16        forward, raise your hand, please.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it, it moves forward.

19             Any more under Section 8?

20             Commissioner Rundle.

21             COMMISSIONER RUNDLE:  To go along with Section

22        II-8-f-1, I'll move Section II-8-f-1a.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay, read please.

24             READING CLERK:  Article II, Section 8-f-1a,

25        "Strengthen the powers of the Ethics Commission."


                     
 

			                                                                          91

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving it

2        forward, raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it, barely.

5             All right.  Any more?

6             Commissioner Barnett.

7             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  I'd like to move II-8-x-2.

8        Article II, Section 8, proposal x-2.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it, please.

10             READING CLERK:  Article II, Section 8-x-2, "Members

11        of the legislative branch should be subject to sanction

12        for ethics violations notwithstanding reliance on the

13        advice of counsel, as are all other officers and employees

14        subject to the Code."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

16        moving that forward, raise your hand please.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it.  It moves forward.

19        Any additional?

20             Commissioner Freidin.

21             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  I'd like to move Article II,

22        Section 8-x-1.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it please, sir.

24             READING CLERK:  Article II, Section 8-x-1, "Transfer

25        to Article II, Section 8, provisions of Article III,


                     
 

			                                                                          92

1        Section 18, which requires the enactment of a Code of

2        Ethics for public officers and employees."

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  In favor, raise your

4        hand, please.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It makes it.  Any more?  Last

7        call.

8             (No response.)

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article II, Section 10 -- x, new

10        section.  That was ten in Roman numerals.  When I was

11        educated, that's how we did numbers.  That was in Pioneer,

12        Florida.

13             Do we have any under x at all?

14             (No response.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  None under x.  Okay.  Now we go

16        to Article III.  Article III, Section 1.  We will go to

17        Commissioner Scott's general topics.  First,

18        reapportionment by an independent commission.  I'll just

19        go through these, Commissioner Scott, if that's agreeable.

20        All in favor of reapportionment -- going forward with the

21        concept of reapportionment by an independent commission,

22        raise your hand.

23             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it.

25             Length of terms and term limitations, everybody that


                     
 

			                                                                          93

1        wants to move that forward.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It carries forward.

4             Residency and other qualifications of members.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

7             And form of session.

8             Commissioner Scott.

9             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  This form of session is the

10        issue of whether we are going to have a bifurcated

11        session, whether we take up separate budget sessions, some

12        of the Mallory Horne discussions.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That may be in some of these.

14        Commissioner Barkdull, did you move that?

15             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Yes, sir.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  And Commissioner Zack moves it,

17        too.  No, everybody is voting on it.  Okay, let's vote on

18        it.

19             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

21             Section 3 we did.

22             Section 5, Article III.  No, wait a minute, we didn't

23        do Section 3, I did -- we need to start with Article III,

24        Section 1.

25             Move -- Commissioner Riley moves 1.


                     
 

			                                                                          94

1             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  III-1-1b.

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That brings us back, Commissioner

5        Riley, should we include the judicial and executive branch

6        as well.

7             Article III, Section 1, anybody?

8             Yes, Commissioner Barnett.  You will be next,

9        Commissioner Sundberg.

10             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  Article III, Section 1-4.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read please.

12             READING CLERK:  Article III, Section 1-4, "All for

13        multiple-member districts; at least a multiple-member

14        house and a single-member senate."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

16        forward, raise your hand.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it.

19             Any more?  Commissioner Sundberg.

20             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  I would like to move Article

21        III-1-2.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read.

23             READING CLERK:  Article III, Section 1-2, "Florida

24        should have a one-house Legislature."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that


                     
 

			                                                                          95

1        forward.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Failed.  Wait a minute, it has

4        it.

5             Commissioner Scott.

6             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  In view of the others that have

7        been moved, I would like to move Article III, Section 1-3

8        to require single member districts be set forth in the

9        Constitution.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor -- oh, read it.

11             READING CLERK:  Article III, Section 1-3, "The

12        requirement for single-member districts should be

13        specifically set out in the Constitution."

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

15        forward, raise your hand.

16             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Moves forward.

18             Any more?

19             (No response.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move to

21        Section 3.  Anybody want to move any of those

22        specifically?  The Chair would announce that each one of

23        those would probably go to the committee under

24        Commissioner Scott.  If he wants to, he could just

25        announce that.  If nobody objects, that's the way it will


                     
 

			                                                                          96

1        be.  We will send these with that general provision,

2        Commissioner Scott.

3             Okay.  Article III, Section 5.  Read it -- no, wait a

4        minute, nobody has moved it, excuse me.  Article III,

5        Section 5 proposal.

6             (No response.)

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Nobody moves it.

8             Article III, Section 6.  Anybody move it?

9             (No response.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The next one is Article III,

11        Section 7.  Anybody move any one of those?

12             Yes, Commissioner Evans-Jones.

13             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  Article III, 7-1.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it, please.

15             READING CLERK:  Article III, Section 7-1, "All bills

16        should be published and furnished to members in final form

17        at least three days prior to final passage."

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

19        forward, raise your hand please.

20             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not move forward.  Any

22        more under Section 7?

23             (No response.)

24             Article III, Section 8.

25             Commissioner Barkdull.


                     
 

			                                                                          97

1             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I move that forward.

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it please.

3             READING CLERK:  Article III, Section 8-1, "The period

4        during which the Governor may veto legislation when

5        received during the session should be changed from seven

6        days to 15 days.  The period for gubernatorial veto, when

7        legislation is received after adjournment of the

8        Legislature, should be changed from 15 days to 30 days."

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand

10        please.

11             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

13             All right, the next one -- where are we, 9?  Section

14        9.  All right.

15             (No response.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We move to Section 10.

17             (No response.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We move to Section 11.

19             (No response.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We move to Section 15.  Anybody

21        move Section 15?

22             Commissioner Barkdull.

23             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I'm waiting for you to get to

24        16.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Oh, okay.  We are almost there.


                     
 

			                                                                          98

1             Anybody have anything on 15?

2             (No response.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, move to 16.

4             Commissioner Barkdull.

5             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I move Section III-16-1,

6        establish an independent redistricting commission.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it, please.

8             READING CLERK:  Article III, Section 16-1, "Establish

9        an independent redistricting commission."

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

11        forward, raise your hand.

12             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

14             Any more under Article III, Section 16?

15             (No response.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article III, Section 18.

17             (No response.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article III, Section 19.  Anybody

19        move anything under 19?

20             (No response.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article III, Section x, not 10.

22             (No response.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article IV, we will move to

24        Article IV, Section 1.

25             I just keep forgetting you, Commissioner Scott.


                     
 

			                                                                          99

1             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  I'm sure it is not intentional.

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It really isn't because how could

3        I ever forget you, sir.

4             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  This is -- the first one is a

5        restructuring of the Cabinet.  This is an example where

6        there is all kinds of ideas.  And the idea was we would

7        take this concept and look at it rather than trying to

8        take, say, the Nelson proposal or any particular proposal.

9        So I move it.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You are moving it, right?  All in

11        favor of moving the concept raise your hand.

12             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

14             The next one is a merger of the Marine Fisheries

15        Commission and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish

16        Commission.  All in favor of moving that forward, raise

17        your hand.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

20             Article IV, then we will revert to the calendar,

21        Article IV, 1.

22             (No response.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Article IV, Section 3.

24        Article IV, Section 5.  Anybody want to move either of

25        those specific items?  It is covered under, as


                     
 

			                                                                          100

1        Commissioner Scott pointed out, it is the one we just

2        passed.

3             Article IV, Section 6.  What is that?  It says,

4        repeal this to the extent that the department may be

5        placed under the direct supervision of the Governor and

6        Cabinet.

7             (No response.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We will move to Article IV,

9        Section 7.

10             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman, I'd like to

11        move that.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Commissioner Barkdull

13        moves Article IV, Section 7.  Please read.

14             READING CLERK:  Article IV, Section 7-b-1, "The

15        Senate should be required to either remove or reinstate an

16        official suspended by the Governor.  Currently, the Senate

17        can simply fail to take action."

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

19        forward, raise your hand.

20             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

22             Article -- Section 8.  Anybody move Section 8?

23             (No response.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Section 9, we have -- this is

25        covered, I think, under the provisions of Commissioner


                     
 

			                                                                          101

1        Scott's motion.

2             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  I know this is covered, but

3        this specific language -- this is very specific language

4        and I'd like to go ahead and move it.

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Number 1?

6             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  Right.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Henderson moves

8        Article IV, Section 9-1.  All in favor of moving that

9        forward, raise your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

12             Commissioner Barnett.

13             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  I want to ask a question about

14        IV-9-2 which really deals with perhaps legislative --

15        treating the Game and Fish Commission, or whatever unified

16        body there was, as an executive agency as opposed to a

17        constitutional agency.  Is that covered under the broad

18        categorization of unification?

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I would so rule that it is

20        covered under the move forward that we made of

21        Commissioner Scott's.

22             All right, Section x.

23             Commissioner Morsani.

24             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  We should adopt Section IV-x-3

25        there, I guess.


                     
 

			                                                                          102

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'm going to put you in the same

2        house as Commissioner Anthony.  All those favor of moving

3        that forward, raise your hand.

4             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not.

6             Article IV, Section x.

7             (No response.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, we move to Article V.

9        Article V, Section 1 -- no, no, no.  State participation

10        in Article V costs is moved by Commissioner Scott.  All in

11        favor, raise your hand.

12             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

14             Merit retention of judges.

15             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Question.  Do I understand the

16        Chair's ruling to be that that is broad enough to include

17        the issue of election of judges?

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No, it does not.

19             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  I would move that we add it so

20        it would read merit retention and election of judges.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  With that amendment, without

22        objection, we will vote on the concept of merit retention

23        or election of judges.  All in favor of that going forward

24        raise your hand.

25             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)


                     
 

			                                                                          103

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

2             Qualifications and terms of judges.  It has been

3        moved, all in favor.

4             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

6             Fully informed juries.  All in favor, raise your

7        hand.

8             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It fails.

10             Regulation of attorneys.  All in favor, raise your

11        hand.

12             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It fails.

14             All right.  Now we will move to the specifics of

15        Article V -- beg your pardon.

16             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  I was going to move V-1-1, which

17        I think is slightly different --

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Zack.

19             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  Excuse me.  I move V-1-1, which

20        is slightly different than what has been moved as the

21        responsibility to fully fund as opposed to participate in.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of 5-1-1, raise your

23        hand.

24             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.


                     
 

			                                                                          104

1             Any more?

2             (No response.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article V, Section 2.

4             Commissioner Rundle.

5             COMMISSIONER RUNDLE:  Yes, I move Section V-2-a-1.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor -- excuse me, read

7        it.

8             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 2-a-1, "Court

9        shall submit criminal rules of procedure to the

10        Legislature for adoption."

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand.

12             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Fails.

14             Any more under Section 2?

15             (No response.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Section 3.

17             Commissioner Langley, not a debate, I trust?

18             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  No, sir.  Mr. Chairman, I

19        just -- I would like to offer V-2-b-1, which is a

20        temporary assignment.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read V-2-b-1.

22             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 2-b-1, "Strike

23        'temporary' from Article V, Section 2(b), to provide for

24        unlimited cross-assignments of judges between the trial

25        courts."


                     
 

			                                                                          105

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

2        forward, raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Can we now move to

5        Article V, Section 3?

6             COMMISSIONER SMITH:  Did that go forward?

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yeah, there were ten votes.

8             COMMISSIONER SMITH:  Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Anybody move anything under V,

10        Section 3?

11             Commissioner Morsani.

12             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  I had a question.  In the

13        presentations that the officers gave in Gainesville, I

14        know we already addressed the earlier one of the things

15        with the National Guard about the court martials, but are

16        these relevant to any of that?

17             You gentlemen and ladies from the law, help us here.

18        We never like lawyers until we need you.  (Laughter.)  So

19        can you help me out here about that -- excuse me, can you

20        help me out with those two sections, please?

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Anybody want to respond to that

22        that knows military law or National Guard law?

23             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  Does anybody know if they

24        will accept --

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Who is speaking?  Commissioner


                     
 

			                                                                          106

1        Sundberg.

2             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  Does anybody know whether or

3        not this court will accept certified questions from state

4        courts?

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well he is talking about 2-a, I

6        think, number 2, a-2, to allow a military court-martial to

7        be conducted by military judges.  Is that the one you're

8        talking about?

9             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  I thought he was talking

10        about a-1, I'm sorry.

11             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  Yes, sir.  I was talking about

12        both of those because I don't understand them but I know

13        that had come up.  So I was asking the question for

14        clarification on both 3-a-1 and I guess 3-a-2.

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Does anybody know -- I understood

16        the fellow said the reason that they wanted that is

17        presently the National Guard officers could not act as

18        judges in anything other than summaries, summary

19        court-martials.  Was that your understanding of what he

20        said, Commissioner Langley?

21             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Yes, sir.  And I would move

22        both of those concepts, if Commissioner Morsani was not

23        going to.  At least they will be before us and we can have

24        them explained to the committee.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  They have been moved.  First we


                     
 

			                                                                          107

1        will take 3-a.  Read please.

2             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 3-a-1, "Amend

3        Article V to allow the District Courts of Appeal and the

4        Supreme Court to submit questions of military law to the

5        Federal Courts of Appeal for the Uniform Services for an

6        advisory opinion."

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

8        forward, raise your hand please.

9             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

11             All right, read 2.

12             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 3-a-2, "Amend

13        Article V to allow a military court-martial to be

14        conducted by military judges of the Florida National

15        Guard, with direct appeal to the First District Court of

16        Appeal."

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

18        forward, raise your hand.

19             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

21             We will go over to the next page.  Commissioner

22        Nabors.

23             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  Make sure I understand and I'm

24        concerned about that in the quest to try to limit the

25        ultimate debate that we have, and we are not -- as I


                     
 

			                                                                          108

1        understand the rules, when we move something like this

2        forward as a specific proposal to committee, it is going

3        to survive to the very end and be voted on.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It won't survive to the bitter

5        end, but it will come back from the committee with a

6        recommendation or a committee substitute in which that

7        subject matter is involved and it can be voted on

8        immediately, or for debate.  And the amendments can be

9        altered.  Nothing is over until the fat lady sings.

10             Any more under 3-a-3?  I mean 3 -- IV.

11             (No response.)

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  If not, we will move on to V,

13        Article V, Section 5.

14             (No response.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move on to

16        Article V, Section 8.

17             Commissioner Wetherington.

18             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  I would move Section

19        V-8-2 and Section 5-8-4.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let's go 2 first.  Read 2,

21        please.

22             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 8-2, "Amend

23        Article V, Section 8, relating to mandatory retirement,

24        and raise the retirement age from 70 to age 72 with no

25        opportunity for the justice or judge to serve any


                     
 

			                                                                          109

1        remaining term of office."

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of that going

3        forward, raise your hand.

4             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You have another one there that

6        says, eliminate it, so -- nobody has moved that yet.

7             Commissioner Sundberg.  Wait a minute, we haven't

8        voted on this.  Everybody that is -- we are going to read

9        it before and then we are going to vote.

10             Read it please, sir.

11             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 8-4, "All judges

12        should be approved by a qualifications screening process,

13        even those who run for office."

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No, we haven't voted on 2, I

15        don't think; have we?  Read 2 again.

16             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 8-2, "Amend

17        Article V, Section 8, relating to mandatory retirement,

18        and raise the retirement age from 70 to age 72 with no

19        opportunity for the justice or judge to serve any

20        remaining term of office."

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Everybody in favor of moving that

22        forward, raise your hand.

23             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

25             Now 4.


                     
 

			                                                                          110

1             SECRETARY BLANTON:  The first one is a and the second

2        is b.  He needs to distinguish which one he wants to move.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Proceed, Commissioner Sundberg.

4             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  I'm sorry, has 4 been moved

5        by another commissioner?  He moved both, I'm sorry.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yeah, there is two 4s there,

7        Commissioner Wetherington.  There is 4a, which is, all

8        judges should be approved by a screening process.  So it

9        is Article V, Section 8- or 8-4b.  And add b to that and

10        would you read that?

11             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 8-4b, "Amend

12        Article V, Section 8, relating to the qualifications of

13        trial judges to increase the experience level for circuit

14        and county court judges from five to ten years membership

15        in The Florida Bar."

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

17        forward, raise your hand.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

20             All right.  Any more under Article V, Section 8?

21             Commissioner Sundberg.

22             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  Mr. Chairman, I would move

23        Article V-8-1, which eliminates any required retirement

24        age for judges or justices.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read Article V-8-1.


                     
 

			                                                                          111

1             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 8-1, "Amend

2        Article V, Section 8, by removing the requirement for

3        mandatory retirement of justices and judges over the age

4        of 70."

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

6        forward, raise your hand.

7             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

9             Any more under Article V, Section 8?

10             (No response.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  If not, we will move forward to

12        Article V, Section 10.  Anybody move -- I'll give somebody

13        an opportunity.

14             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  I'll move it just to make

15        sure.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Wetherington moves

17        10-a-1?  Is that the one you move?

18             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  Yes.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read please.

20             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 10-a-1, "Amend

21        Article V, Subsections 10 and 11, to extend the system of

22        merit selection and retention to the trial courts."

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that,

24        raise your hand please.

25             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)


                     
 

			                                                                          112

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Moved forward.

2             Any more under Article V, Section 10?

3             (No response.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move forward

5        to Article V, Section 12.  Anybody move anything on

6        Article V, Section 12?

7             (No response.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article V, Section 15.

9             (No response.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article V, Section 18.

11             (No response.)

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article V, Section 19.  And also

13        she tells me that at the bottom, where it says V-19-1b,

14        that goes under this Article V, Section 19, as well.  So

15        there are three items under 19.  At the very bottom of the

16        page, it is on Page 8 and it is, improve supervision of

17        attorneys and judges, is what it says, and that's all it

18        says.  And the other two are 19-1 and 19-1a, that's on

19        that same page.

20             We will move to -- hearing none, we will move to

21        Section x of Article V.

22             All right.  We will move.

23             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I got lost, and I

24        had a request.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We found you.  Commissioner


                     
 

			                                                                          113

1        Connor.

2             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  I request to go back to one

3        item if we may.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Go ahead.

5             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I would move

6        V-15-5.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read please.

8             READING CLERK:  Article V, Section 15-5, "Require all

9        lawyers to disclose that monies held for the benefit of

10        their clients may be kept in an interest-bearing account

11        for the client's benefit rather than an interest for the

12        benefit of The Florida Bar Association [sic]."

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The Foundation.  All who want to

14        move that forward, raise your hand.

15             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Eight, it does not make it.

17             We are still on Article V, Section x.

18             (No response.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:   Article VI we will move to next.

20        Commissioner Scott, I'll just tack them off here and say

21        that you move these concepts, unless you want to do it.

22             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman --

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Scott.

24             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  -- the first one, ballot access

25        by minority parties, was an issue that was raised by the,


                     
 

			                                                                          114

1        before the commission.  Do you want to take that one

2        first?  The second one I have a comment on.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Everybody that's in favor of that

4        concept going forward, raise your hand.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

7             Term limitations.

8             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, this issue was

9        brought up by a number of proposals.  We have already

10        dealt with that issue so far as the Legislature, the

11        legislative term limits.  So there are so many different

12        proposals that if it is okay with the commission, I would

13        like to not propose this term limit and then go through

14        the individual --

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You withdraw that proposal.  All

16        right.

17             We will then move to the calendar on Article VI.

18        First Article VI, Section 1.

19             Commissioner Anthony.

20             COMMISSIONER ANTHONY:  Mr. Chairman, I would like to

21        move item VI-1-3.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it please, sir.

23             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section 1-3, "Allow

24        voting on weekends, allow two days for voting."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Everybody that wants that to go


                     
 

			                                                                          115

1        forward, raise your hand.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.  It does go

4        forward.

5             All right.  Article VI, Section 1, we are still on,

6        two more items there.

7             (No response.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Hearing none, I move on to

9        Section 2, Article VI.

10             Commissioner Riley.

11             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I move forward VI-2-1.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it please, sir.

13             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section 2-1, "Require

14        that all candidates must be registered Florida voters for

15        at least one year, and live in the district for at least

16        six months, and continue to live in the district for the

17        entire term."

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

19        forward, raise your hand.

20             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Make it ten, that will make it

22        go.  All right.

23             Any more under -- yes, Commissioner Evans-Jones.

24             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  I got lost too way back.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay, we'll find you.


                     
 

			                                                                          116

1             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  On Article V, on the slip

2        that Mr. Scott gave us, regulation of attorneys.  Did we

3        vote for that?

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No, it did not get 11 votes.  We

5        voted on it, and it didn't get 11 votes -- I mean ten.  It

6        didn't even get ten votes, much less 11 votes.  All right.

7        We did vote on it, Commissioner Evans-Jones.

8             We are still on Section 2 of Article VI.

9             Commissioner Barnett.

10             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  Article VI, Section 2-2.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it, please.

12             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section 2-2, "Amend

13        Article VI, Section 2, to accurately reflect that the

14        legal voting age is 18 rather than 21 years of age."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

16        forward, raise your hand please.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

19             Any more there?  There is only one more.

20             (No response.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article VI, Section 4.  Did I

22        miss you, Commissioner Freidin?

23             COMMISSIONER FREIDIN:  No, it was covered.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article IV, Section 4.

25             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  VI, 4.


                     
 

			                                                                          117

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article VI, Section 4.

2             Commissioner Connor.

3             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I'll move Article

4        VI-4-1.

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it, please.

6             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section 4-1, "Impose term

7        limits on all officials, including judges."

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

9        forward, raise your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It fails.  Any more?

12             Commissioner Langley.

13             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  I would like to move VI-4-4.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it.

15             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section 4-4, "Extend term

16        limits to include city and county officials."

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

18        forward, raise your hand.

19             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It fails.

21             Commissioner Sundberg.

22             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  I'd like to move Article

23        VI-4-2.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right, read it.

25             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section 4-2, "Remove all


                     
 

			                                                                          118

1        term limits from the Constitution."

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

3        forward, raise your hand.

4             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

6             All right.  Any more on there?

7             (No response.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move to

9        Article VI, Section 5.  There is one there.  Does anybody

10        move Article VI, Section 5?

11             (No response.)

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We will go forward.  Visitors in

13        the gallery, would you please turn your phones off?  I

14        think the rule in the Senate and the rule here is you

15        don't operate these cell phones in the gallery and we are

16        having some difficulties.

17             All right.  Article VI, Section 6.

18             (No response.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move to

20        Article VI, Section 7.

21             (No response.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article VI, Section x.  There is

23        quite a few of those so we will take a little time.

24             (Off-the-record comment.)

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  As a general statement we have,


                     
 

			                                                                          119

1        but there are a large number of specific proposals.  If

2        anybody wants to move them, any one of them, now is the

3        time.

4             Commissioner Mathis.

5             COMMISSIONER MATHIS:  I'd like to move Article

6        VI-x-9.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  VI-x-9 has been moved.  Read it,

8        please.

9             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section x-9, "Provide for

10        a mechanism to recall justices of the Supreme Court and

11        other elected officials."

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

13        forward, raise your hand.

14             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.

16             Any more under Article VI-x?

17             COMMISSIONER LEESFIELD:  Mr. Chairman?

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes, Commissioner.

19             COMMISSIONER LEESFIELD:  I would like to move Article

20        VI-x-12, support open financing of campaigns.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's all right, he can make the

22        motion.  Read it, please.

23             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section x-12, "Support

24        public financing of campaigns."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'll move it.  Let the record


                     
 

			                                                                          120

1        reflect that I moved that.  The alternate might be

2        questioned as to whether he can make a motion so I'll make

3        the motion that we consider that, x-12.

4             You read that; did you not?

5             READING CLERK:  Yes, sir.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

7        forward, raise your hand.

8             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It carries forward.  Any more?

10             Commissioner Riley.

11             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to move forward x-15.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  X-15, read, please.

13             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section x-15, "Prohibit

14        the second primary and allow for weekend voting."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

16        forward, raise your hand.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Get them up, we have got to count

19        them again.

20             It carries forward.

21             Any more under Article VI?

22             COMMISSIONER MARSHALL:  Mr. Chairman?

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Marshall.

24             COMMISSIONER MARSHALL:  Move forward, move forward

25        VI-x-1 please.


                     
 

			                                                                          121

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  VI-x-1, read, please.

2             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section x-1, "Modify the

3        ballot access laws to increase participation and diminish

4        the power of the major parties."

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that

6        forward, please raise your hand.

7             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has it.  It goes forward.

9             Any more under -- yes, Commissioner Mills.

10             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  VI-x-14, although I think there

11        are two issues there.  One is open primary and one is

12        requiring parties to pay.  But open primary would be my

13        motion, or both of them if I need to.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  If you want to split them,

15        we will.

16             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Okay.  Then I'd move the portion

17        of that that is open primary for discussion.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  So you are moving

19        forward the portion of that that would allow for an open

20        primary thereby allowing all parties to participate.  We

21        will call that x-14a if we go the other way.  We can call

22        the first one b -- we'll call it something.  If you would

23        read that.

24             READING CLERK:  Article VI, Section x-14, "Require

25        political parties to pay for primary election.  Allow for


                     
 

			                                                                          122

1        an open primary, thereby allowing all parties to

2        participate."

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The first sentence is stricken

4        from his motion.  Does everybody understand?  We are

5        voting on this:  Allow for an open primary, thereby

6        allowing all parties to participate.  So it is an open

7        primary proposal.  And he is moving that forward.  And it

8        will be x-14a on the record.  All in favor of moving that

9        forward, raise your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.

12             Now you don't want to move the other one; is that

13        right?  Commissioner Mills, you don't want to move what

14        would be b; is that correct?

15             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  (Indicates negatively.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  What that means, as

17        Commissioner Langley points out, is we will consider it --

18        one form of the open primary is when there is a primary

19        election you can go select where you vote.  That's one

20        form of it.

21             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Mr. Chairman, I have got to

22        announce that I am amazed and applaud the Democratic party

23        for their sudden interest in open and fair elections.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  After you people switched back a

25        few years ago, such as some that are here, it was


                     
 

			                                                                          123

1        necessary.

2             (Laughter.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  I wasn't referring to

4        you, sir.

5             All right.  Any more under VI-x?

6             (No response.)

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Any more under VI?  All right,

8        VI-x.

9             (No response.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We go to Article VII.

11             Commissioner Scott, you are recognized for your

12        concepts.

13             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Well, again, these are

14        proposals -- and I want to make this caveat -- this is not

15        necessarily that we are in favor of it, limitation of

16        homestead exemption from taxation, the question of the

17        first 25 or whatever, that's what we are talking about

18        here, the speakers that raised that issue.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Limitation of homestead exemption

20        from taxation as a concept.  All in favor of moving that

21        forward, raise your hand.

22             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does move forward.

24             Treatment of municipalities compared to the treatment

25        of other political subdivisions and the state.


                     
 

			                                                                          124

1             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Right.  Mr. Chairman, that item

2        should really include airports and seaports as well, not

3        just municipalities, because that is the issue.  There is

4        a separate issue that it is Article VII-3-a-2 that should

5        be included in that one.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  What you are really saying is the

7        treatment of municipalities and other political

8        subdivisions to be treated with the treatment of other

9        political subdivisions in the state to make them all

10        comparable.

11             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Right.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Everybody understand that?  If

13        you are for moving that forward, raise your hand, please.

14             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.  Sales tax

16        exemptions, budget process and extraordinary votes.

17             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Right.  Mr. Chairman, let me say

18        that we had some speakers that raised the question of the

19        sales tax exemptions, sunset of sales tax exemptions,

20        that's what part of that item is.  The second part is the

21        question of the budget process, that was in the budget and

22        taxation changes that have been made, including the

23        waiting periods and no waiting periods.  And we need to

24        straighten that out.

25             And we do not have a proposal yet, but we expect to


                     
 

			                                                                          125

1        bring one before the committee, if you-all approve this,

2        next time, whenever we meet to discuss, to have it

3        available.

4             And the other one is the issue that was raised by a

5        number of speakers about requiring extraordinary votes.

6        Again, not saying that I or anyone is stating a position

7        on that, but requiring extraordinary votes to increase

8        taxes and to make other changes.  So those are what those

9        three issues are.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  The Chair has a question.  Does

11        this include the proposal that we allow for the imposition

12        of an income tax that was proposed?

13             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  No.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Just thought maybe you were broad

15        enough to --

16             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  I am not totally asleep here,

17        Mr. Chairman.

18             (Laughter.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, I thought you said it was

20        broad enough to cover the whole subject.

21             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Sales tax exemptions, budget

22        process and extraordinary votes.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Everybody in favor of moving this

24        limited concept forward, very broadly limited concept,

25        raise your hand.


                     
 

			                                                                          126

1             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  It goes forward.

3             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, with your

4        indulgence, either I want to say under this article or

5        where appropriate, there is an issue that a number of

6        speakers raised that we did not get printed on this and

7        some of the commissioners brought up involving unfunded

8        mandates.  And they want to have a discussion regarding

9        unfunded mandates in the finance and taxation committee.

10        So I would like to add that, with the indulgence of the

11        commission, unfunded mandates.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Wouldn't it also be appropriate

13        to refer that to the local government committee?

14             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  It may be.  Maybe it was going

15        to go both places, but wherever it is appropriate.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's included in this, so all

17        in favor of moving these items forward, raise your hand.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  They do move forward.

20             We will now go to Article VIII -- excuse me, Article

21        VII, Section 1.

22             (No response.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Hearing no motions on Section

24        1 -- Commissioner Connor.

25             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I would move


                     
 

			                                                                          127

1        Article VII, Section 1-e-2, impose spending limits on the

2        government.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read, please.

4             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 1-e-2, "Impose

5        spending limits on the government."

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor, raise your hand.

7             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Raise them again.  They keep

9        going up here, let's see.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It will move forward.

12             Article VII, Section 2.  Commissioner Mills.

13             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  Section VII-2-1.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read, please.

15             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 2-1, "Remove

16        intangible personal property taxes from the law."

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of going forward.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes.  Any more there?  There

20        is only one more.  Okay.

21             (Off-the-record comment.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yeah, the last one did, VII-2-1

23        received the necessary votes to go forward.  Article --

24             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, point of

25        information.  I recall that we had a representative


                     
 

			                                                                          128

1        address this in Orlando on spending limitations and I

2        can't recall if the Orlando proposals were supposed to be

3        included --

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think they are.

5             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  -- but I didn't see it and I

6        wanted to move that proposal as well.  I think it was --

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  If it is not in there, we will

8        take it up at the next meeting.

9             Commissioner Riley.

10             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Mr. Chairman, another point of

11        information.  Concerning proposals like that that we know

12        are not in here, what we are doing today, since we are

13        going immediately to committee meetings, will we be

14        meeting as a full commission to --

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes.

16             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  In response to this --

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  There will be plenty to keep the

18        committees busy and we will have a meeting of the next

19        commission on everything.  And we will bring these up that

20        haven't been considered.

21             Yes, Commissioner West.

22             COMMISSIONER WEST:  Just a question.  How was this

23        prepared because I remember that same proposal.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  This was prepared with the public

25        hearings.  It does not include Orlando, Tampa, Daytona


                     
 

			                                                                          129

1        Beach, Tampa and Ft. Myers.

2             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Oh, it does not.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Those have not been completed so

4        we will take them up at the next meeting and run through

5        them.  And a lot of them, if they are duplicated we won't

6        take them up exactly at all.

7             Okay.  Now let's move to, where are we?  We are at

8        Article VII, Section 3 -- Article VII, Section 3.

9             Commissioner Mathis.

10             COMMISSIONER MATHIS:  Just as a point of

11        clarification.  Can I assume that Article VII-3-a-2 is

12        included in Mr. Scott's proposals?

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, you can go ahead and move

14        it if you have got any doubt.  Do you move that?

15        Commissioner Mathis moves it.  Read it.

16             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 3-a-2, "Extend

17        the exemption provided to county-owned seaports and

18        airports to those owned by municipal and special district

19        seaports and airports."

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Everybody in favor of

21        moving forward on that, raise your hand.

22             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does move forward.  Any more

24        on VII, Section 3?

25             Commissioner Evans-Jones.


                     
 

			                                                                          130

1             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  Section VII-3-a-4.

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read Section

3        VII-3-a-4, please.

4             READING CLERK:  Section VII-3-a-4, "Amend the

5        doctrine of sovereign immunity to provide that public

6        property leased to a private entity is subject to

7        taxation."

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

9        moving that forward, raise your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It moves forward.  And I will

12        entertain a question, but everybody has already voted.

13             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  What does sovereign

14        immunity have to do with the taxation?

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner -- well, it's not in

16        the Constitution anywhere, as you know, Judge --

17        Commissioner.  The term "sovereign immunity" is not in the

18        Constitution.  It doesn't use the language.

19             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  Right, I understand.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  So technically it is not in the

21        Constitution anywhere.

22             Commissioner Barnett.

23             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  The way I interpreted that,

24        Commissioner Wetherington, is really the question of

25        immunity versus exemption from taxation.  Just in the


                     
 

			                                                                          131

1        summary, they had used the wrong words --

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's correct.  I think we'll

3        clean that up because the words "sovereign immunity" does

4        not need to be in there, Commissioner Wetherington.  Thank

5        you for that observation.

6             Any more on Article VII, Section -- correct that for

7        the record.

8             (Off-the-record discussion.)

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Barnett, would you

10        state that again for the record so that we can rewrite

11        that?

12             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  When I read VII-3-a-4 and it

13        said the doctrine of sovereign immunity, I really

14        interpreted that to be the question of whether an entity

15        was immune from taxation or exempt from taxation.  And so

16        that should be the word rather than "sovereign immunity,"

17        it is just immunity versus exemption.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  That's fair enough.

19        We are still on Article VII, Section 3.  Any more there?

20             (No response.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move to

22        Article VII, Section 4.

23             (No response.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Hearing no motions, we will move

25        forward to Article VI, Section 5.


                     
 

			                                                                          132

1             Commissioner Barnett.

2             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  I'm going to take a deep

3        breath.  I move VII-5-1.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Read VII-5-1.

5             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 5-1, "Eliminate

6        the constitutional ban on a state income tax."

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  And Commissioner, record

8        Senator Scott -- Commissioner Scott as voting.  I don't

9        want anything to do with that.  Everybody in favor of

10        moving that forward, raise your hand.

11             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Question, Chair.  On the

12        wording of that, there is no constitutional ban against

13        the income tax.  As a matter of fact, it says that it

14        shall not exceed 5 percent.  But there is no ban on it.

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We will note that and rewrite it.

16        What she wants to do is provide that you can have an

17        income tax, I interpret that.

18             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  You already can is what I'm

19        trying to say.  Article V says you can have it but it

20        can't exceed 5 percent --

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, I'm not going to get into

22        an argument on the law right here and now.  But what she

23        wants to do is move forward the idea that we can have a

24        state income tax; is that right?

25             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  My purpose is making sure that


                     
 

			                                                                          133

1        this commission at least have an opportunity to address

2        the question of whether we should give the Legislature

3        authority to impose a personal income tax.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  With that being rewritten in that

5        manner, and we won't have to read it because we will have

6        to read it when we get through, all those in favor of

7        Commissioner Barnett's motion that we amend the

8        Constitution so that we can allow the Legislature to

9        impose a personal income tax, is that right, Commissioner

10        Barnett?

11             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  That's close, yes, sir.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  All those in favor of

13        moving that forward, raise your hand.

14             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It will move forward as proposed

16        by Commissioner Barnett.  And now we will call on

17        Commissioner Riley.

18             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  In the -- with the understanding

19        that inclusion is a positive thing, I'd like to move

20        forward VII-5-2.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  VII-5-2.  Okay.  All you other

22        guys get to vote on this.  Read it please, sir.

23             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 5-2, "Prohibit

24        state income tax."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving that


                     
 

			                                                                          134

1        forward.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Tie vote.  State income tax would

4        also include corporate income tax which would be a repeal

5        of an existing tax.  Do you want to include that in your

6        motion or were you thinking in terms of the program --

7             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Mr. Chairman, I'm going by what

8        this says.  And in the interest of getting it to

9        committees for discussion, that's my purpose in including

10        it forward.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  With that understanding,

12        if you want to vote again, we will, if not, we will move

13        forward.  Okay.  We move forward.  Article VII, Section 6.

14             Commissioner Ford-Coates.

15             COMMISSIONER FORD-COATES:  I'd like to move VII-6-7.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it please, sir.

17             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 6-7, "Provide an

18        exemption for the first $5,000 of tangible personal

19        property."

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

21        moving that forward.

22             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does have the requisite votes.

24        It will move forward.

25             Commissioner Ford-Coates.


                     
 

			                                                                          135

1             COMMISSIONER FORD-COATES:  Article VII-6-10.

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read that, please.

3             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 6-10, "Amend the

4        constitution to permit the partial year assessment of

5        homestead property in order to recover the costs of

6        providing services to new homestead property completed

7        after January 1st of each new year."

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

9        moving that forward, raise your hand.

10             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does move forward.

12             Commissioner Anthony.

13             COMMISSIONER ANTHONY:  Article VII-6-4.

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it, please.

15             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 6-4, "Require

16        everyone to pay ad valorem tax on 50 percent of the first

17        $50,000 of assessed valuation and 100 percent on amounts

18        over $50,000."

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

20        moving that forward.

21             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Now the hands keep

23        going up.  Let's raise them again.

24             SECRETARY:  There are 10.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  There are -- it does go forward.


                     
 

			                                                                          136

1             Okay.  Any more here under Article VI, Section 6?

2             Commissioner Riley.

3             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to move forward 6-6.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it, please.

5             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 6-6, "Index the

6        homestead exemption provision to inflation."

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Would that include deflation?

8        Serious question.

9             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Again, I would refer to what's

10        been given to us as proposals from the public.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor of moving that

12        forward, raise your hand.

13             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not move forward.

15        Anything else under Section VII-6?

16             Commissioner Evans-Jones.

17             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  VII-6-1.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it, please.

19             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 6-1, "Amend

20        Article VII, Section 6, to provide a homestead exemption

21        on the second $25,000 rather than the first."

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Everybody in favor of

23        moving that forward, raise your hand.  It's 6-1.

24             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not carry forward.  All


                     
 

			                                                                          137

1        right.  The appointed hour -- we can pick up -- if you

2        have got any more on 6-1, we can conclude them right now.

3             Commissioner Henderson.

4             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  If you're about to conclude,

5        I just want to raise a question of the Chair.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We are going to go eat lunch and

7        it's back here.

8             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  I understand.  The question

9        is does the Chair anticipate that we will conclude our

10        business today?

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I doubt it.  We are going to

12        conclude the commission business but we may need to have

13        committee meetings and we may not be able to conclude or

14        we may.  I don't want anybody to count on it yet.  We are

15        going to try to, let's put it that way.

16             Commissioner Connor.

17             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Point of information,

18        Mr. Chairman, because I think it has been causing anxiety

19        among a variety of members.  It was my impression that if

20        a proposal fell within the broad rubric that Mr. Scott had

21        used to describe it, that it was not necessary to move an

22        individual proposal.  Notwithstanding that, some

23        individual proposals have been moved and failed passage.

24             I believe that some folks didn't vote for those

25        individual proposals believing, nevertheless, that they


                     
 

			                                                                          138

1        were covered by the broader descriptor and that their mere

2        failure on an individual basis would not preclude their

3        consideration.  Would the Chair clarify that issue for me,

4        please?

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I will clarify it later.  I have

6        my own opinion, but I'm going to submit it to the rules

7        committee and ask them to advise me what their opinion is

8        and then I'll make a ruling after that.

9             Commissioner Langley.

10             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Mr. Chairman, on -- under the

11        very able guidance of your chairmanship today we've made a

12        lot of progress, and a lot of us who don't live here in

13        Tallahassee have rooms reserved tonight and guaranteed and

14        what have you and I don't know what committees would do if

15        they met today unless they just said, "Hi, let's go home."

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  If you could wait until I meet

17        with your committee at lunch, I will make some

18        announcement after lunch.

19             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Okay.  Thank you, sir.

20             Commissioner Barkdull?

21             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman, may I make an

22        inquiry?  Do you desire the rules committee to meet

23        immediately upon recess in this room over here?

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That will be fine.  That room

25        over there in the back, the anteroom.


                     
 

			                                                                          139

1             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Immediately following recess.

2        And I now move that we recess until the hour of 1:20.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think you better say 1:30.

4             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  1:30.

5             (Lunch recess from 12:35 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.)

6             (Roll taken and recorded electronically.)

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Please take your seats.  And if

8        you haven't indicated your presence, push your button.

9        Take your seats and indicate your presence.  If you

10        indicated -- push the button.

11             All right.  We will come to order, Commissioners.

12        Commissioner Riley, will you take your seat please, and

13        Commissioner Scott?  If you haven't signified your

14        presence, do it now.  All right.

15             I recognize Commissioner Barkdull.

16             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman, the rules

17        committee met immediately upon adjournment and the report

18        of the committee is on the desk of each member as to the

19        authority and authorization of alternates as to the

20        question of what proposals are still before the committee

21        and as to the recommendation that we dispense with the

22        committee hearings today and we'll adjourn upon completion

23        of the calendar.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  I'll announce that I

25        expect we will definitely be through before late


                     
 

			                                                                          140

1        afternoon.  We're going to proceed through this list.  And

2        I think the matters have been cleared up that needed to

3        be.

4             Commissioner Langley, for what purpose do you rise?

5             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  To correct an error that -- in

6        argumenta about the state income tax.  There is in fact a

7        prohibition.  I was reading Paragraph B and not Paragraph

8        A --

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Section 5, Article VIII.

10             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  If I were in court, I'd be in

11        deep trouble.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Nobody wanted to enter into the

13        legal argument with you on the floor.  Although next time

14        we will.

15             Commissioner Barnett.

16             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  Mr. Chairman, I am a little

17        bit -- I guess I'm confused by the second paragraph of

18        your committee's report.  If I read that correctly, then

19        the -- a lot of the activity we went through this morning

20        in deciding whether there was enough commission support to

21        put a proposal -- to send the proposal forward to

22        committee, was really an exercise just in education of the

23        members to the committee about how others might feel or

24        almost a straw ballot because if in fact something did not

25        receive the votes and is not covered under one of the


                     
 

			                                                                          141

1        umbrella items in Senator Scott's motion, then it appears

2        to me, based on what you say, that every issue is still

3        open and it doesn't prohibit it from coming up in the

4        committee -- and, again, I'm excluding commission members

5        filing it -- then I don't understand what we did this

6        morning as a commission other than a straw ballot on

7        issues of interest to the commission.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, number one, I certainly

9        don't want to get back into this discussion to kill

10        another hour.  I want us to get out of here this

11        afternoon.  Number two, in answering your question the way

12        I interpret what is being done here is, number one, as you

13        correctly point out, any member can introduce anything

14        until the cutoff date and it will go to committee.  What

15        the committees will receive are the drafted versions of

16        those individual items that we passed or gave ten votes or

17        more to to go forward this morning.

18             As it relates to the general subjects, it leaves the

19        committee in the posture of having the NA jurisdiction to

20        write as committee substitutes in these general areas but

21        not to introduce as committee proposals.  And so I'd like

22        to leave this and get on with the voting if we could.

23             Okay.  We'll proceed to Article VII, Section 9.  And

24        I'll discuss this with you later or you can discuss it

25        with the chairman of the rules committee.  Article IX --


                     
 

			                                                                          142

1        VII, Section 9.  Everybody look at that and see if

2        somebody wants to move it.  Article VII, Section 9.

3        Anybody move anything on Article VII, Section 9?

4             (No response.)

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We'll move on to

6        Article VII, Section 12.

7             Commissioner Barkdull.

8             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Mr. Chairman, I'd like to

9        move Article VII, Section 12-1.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article VII, Section 12-1.  Would

11        you read, please.

12             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 12-1, "Narrow

13        the referendum requirement of Article VII, Section 12 to

14        indebtedness payable exclusively from ad valorem taxation

15        and maturing more than 12 months more after issuance."

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

17        moving that forward, raise your hands.  Raise your hands

18        if you're in favor of moving Section 12-1 forward.

19             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not move forward.  All

21        right.  Article VII, Section 12.

22             Commissioner Riley.

23             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Mr. Chairman, I have a question.

24        We had received a letter this morning on our desk from the

25        legislative committee on intergovernment regulations as I


                     
 

			                                                                          143

1        understand it saying that these were met as references

2        that were passed on to the commission, not necessarily

3        recommendations for the Constitution.  Am I correct in

4        that understanding --

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'm informed by the executive

6        director that they got in the summaries and were treated

7        as public proposals and they are not.

8             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Should we then not consider them

9        at this time?

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  There's no point in considering

11        them.  I don't know which ones they are.  Somebody would

12        tell me --

13             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  They say LCIR --

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We'll pass those

15        because they are not public.

16             Commissioner Langley.

17             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Mr. Chairman, probably nobody

18        wants to go home today more than me because I'm flying and

19        the weather is building and I'd like to get out of here as

20        soon as possible, but we have a complete misunderstanding

21        of what I thought went on in the rules committee.  It was

22        my understanding that on those propositions today which

23        were taken up and did not receive ten affirmative sponsors

24        unless they were under the umbrella of the Scott

25        proposals, then they are in fact dead.


                     
 

			                                                                          144

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  They aren't dead, but they don't

2        go forward as public proposals.

3             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Right.  Exactly.

4             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Not what this said --

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's what I thought it said.

6             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  If that's what it says, we're

7        fine --

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I agree with that.  Let's keep

9        going here.  We're going to let you catch your plane and

10        it's going to be fair weather all the way.  Article VII,

11        Section 13.  There is no motion on that.  Article VII,

12        Section 14.  Is everybody paying attention here?  We're on

13        Article VII, Section 14.

14             Commissioner Langley, did you want to move that?

15             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Yes, sir.  I would like to

16        move Article VII-14-1.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes, that's the one we're on.

18        All right.  Everybody -- read that, please.

19             READING CLERK:  Article VII, Section 14-1, "Place

20        water management in general revenue and do not allow

21        independent taxation authority."

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of that

23        proposal going forward, raise your hand.

24             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does go forward.  Article VII,


                     
 

			                                                                          145

1        Section 15-1.  Does anybody move that?

2             (No response.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  If not, we'll move on.  Article

4        VII, Section x.

5             Commissioner Nabors.

6             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  I'd like to move Article

7        VII-x-3 both (1) and (2) either separately or in tandem.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Would you read that,

9        please?

10             READING CLERK:  Article VII-x-3 (1), "Make possible

11        for the Legislature to earmark certain fees/taxes for the

12        bonding of capital outlay and (2) restructure the tax

13        system by eliminating the multitude of exemptions."

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Everybody in favor of

15        going forward on Article VII-x-3 (1) and (2), raise your

16        hands.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It has the necessary votes to go

19        forward.  All right.  We're still on Article VII, Section

20        x.

21             Commissioner Connor.

22             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I would move

23        Article VII, Section x-8, tie increases in government to

24        increases in personal income.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Would you read x-8?


                     
 

			                                                                          146

1             READING CLERK:  Article VII, x-8, "Tie increases in

2        government to increases in personal income."

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor of that going

4        forward, raise your hand.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not have the necessary

7        votes.  Any more on Article VII, Section x?

8             (No response.)

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We will move on to

10        Article VIII, Local Government, beginning with Article

11        VIII, Section 1.

12             Okay.  Commissioner Scott on Article VIII has two

13        topics.  Would you move them?

14             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Yes.  The first is the sovereign

15        immunity issue that we've heard a lot of speakers on

16        and --

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  A myriad of subjects --

18             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  -- address those issues in

19        different respects, caps, no caps, whatever.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of the general

21        concept of sovereign immunity going forward, raise your

22        hand.

23             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does carry.  And then equal

25        treatment on tax exemptions is another more specific


                     
 

			                                                                          147

1        general.

2             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Yes.  Mr. Chairman, if I might

3        just incorporate what we did before.  This was put here

4        because it's under the local government article --

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Right.  It's so done.  It's

6        incorporated as part of the one we've already passed.  All

7        right.  We'll move on to the summary on Article VIII,

8        Section 1.

9             Commissioner Leesfield.

10             COMMISSIONER LEESFIELD:  Yes, I do not see in the

11        specific proposals the sovereign immunity language

12        although I know it was debated at a number of the public

13        hearings.  So I would like to insert it, unless I'm

14        missing it, insert it in the --

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Not sure we're there yet.

16             COMMISSIONER LEESFIELD:  I don't see it in Article

17        VIII, anywhere under Article VIII, under local government

18        any mention of the --

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It's in Article X.

20             COMMISSIONER LEESFIELD:  In Commissioner Scott's,

21        it's under Article VIII, local government.  So to keep it

22        consistent it ought to be brought up in either Article

23        VIII to keep it consistent --

24             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  It also is under X if you'll

25        look --


                     
 

			                                                                          148

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We're going to incorporate it

2        just like we did his tax deal.

3             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  It's in two places,

4        Commissioner.  It's under this one and Article X.

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  So when we get to Article X, it's

6        under it too and that's where the main thrust of it is

7        although there is a thrust in local.  Thank you very much.

8        Article VIII, Section 1, anybody want to move any of

9        those?

10             (No response.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Hearing none, we move on to

12        Article VIII, Section 2.

13             Commissioner Nabors.

14             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  I'd like to move Article VIII,

15        Section 2-a-1.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  2-a-1, would you read it, please?

17             READING CLERK:  Article VIII, Section 2-a-1, "Amend

18        Article VIII, Section 2(a) regarding formation of

19        municipalities, Section 2(c) regarding annexation, and

20        Section 3, regarding consolidation, and to permit charter

21        counties to provide a process for incorporation,

22        consolidation and annexation in its charter or otherwise

23        strengthen the role of local government in the formation

24        process."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of


                     
 

			                                                                          149

1        moving that forward, raise your hand.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does have ten votes.  Any more

4        under Article VIII, Section 2?  Any more under Article

5        VIII, Section 2?  If not, we'll move on.

6             Article VIII, Section 4.  Anybody move 4-1?  If not,

7        we'll go forward.

8             Article VIII, Section 9.

9             Commissioner Nabors.

10             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  I think there's -- in the

11        calendar there was an oversight.  It should be one under

12        Article VIII, Section 5, which is in our handout, it just

13        didn't make it.  It says, overrule Snyder as the

14        quasi-judicial issue.  And somehow --

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, we're on Article VIII,

16        Section 4, at the moment.

17             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  It's under X.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Right now, we're on Article VIII,

19        Section 4, 4-1.  Does anyone want to move it?  If not,

20        we'll move on to Article VIII, Section 9.

21             Yes, Commissioner Anthony.

22             COMMISSIONER ANTHONY:  Yes.  I'd like to move Article

23        VIII-9-b.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Would you read it,

25        please?


                     
 

			                                                                          150

1             READING CLERK:  Article VIII, Section 9-b,  "(a)

2        Amend the Constitution to allow local government to levy

3        taxes (in addition to ad valorem) not inconsistent with

4        general law.  (b) Completely remove state tax preemption.

5        (c) Remove the 10 mil millage caps completely, or allow

6        caps to be set by general law.  (d) Create a process

7        whereby a local government may raise the millage caps.

8        (e) Eliminate the ad valorem tax and replace the tax with

9        other revenue sources."

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Everybody in favor of

11        moving that forward, raise your hand, please.

12             COMMISSIONER SMITH:  I'd like to ask --

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Just a minute.  Commissioner

14        Smith is recognized.

15             COMMISSIONER SMITH:  Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  If he

16        wants to move all of that at one time or if he wants to

17        divide that.  I'm just asking the question --

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  He moved it all at one time and

19        that's where it is now.

20             COMMISSIONER SMITH:  Okay.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of moving it

22        forward.

23             Commissioner Evans.

24             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  I thought that all of the LCIR

25        proposals were withdrawn.


                     
 

			                                                                          151

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  They are.  It doesn't show on

2        mine that it's an LCIR.

3             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  It does on this.

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  You moved it anyway,

5        didn't you?

6             COMMISSIONER ANTHONY:  Mr. Chairman, it is an LCI

7        proposal but seems like such a good proposal to be

8        discussed that it is now an Anthony proposal.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Well, good.  Will you just call

10        the -- tell the secretary to direct you to bill drafting

11        and they'll draw it for you.

12             (Laughter.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Let's move on.

14             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  Mr. Chairman, this is what

15        Sam Bell presented yesterday on behalf of the local

16        government.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It's not in here.  We'll get it

18        at the next meeting.  We've got other things to do the

19        same thing with.

20             (Off-the-record comment.)

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No, he can't move it.  It's not a

22        public proposal that's being considered today.  It wasn't

23        noticed.

24             Commissioner Riley.

25             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Point of order, Mr. Chairman.


                     
 

			                                                                          152

1        There are others that we have passed that have only been

2        put forth --

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  If you would come

4        forward and tell our staff which ones they are, we'll

5        eliminate them from the record later in this meeting --

6             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Just trying to keep it correct.

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's great.  I appreciate it

8        and I'm sure the staff appreciates your help.  Article

9        IX -- excuse me, VIII, Section x now.

10             Commissioner Nabors.

11             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  I'd like to move VIII-x-5.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  VIII-x-5, would you please read

13        it?

14             READING CLERK:  Article VIII-x-5,  "Overrule Snyder

15        v. Brevard County and Jennings v. Dade County thereby

16        permitting citizens the right to speak with their elected

17        official relating to zoning matters."

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Is this the one that dealt

19        generally with the ex parte communications with elected

20        officials other than judiciary?  Okay.  All in favor of

21        moving forward with x-5, raise your hand.

22             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It received the necessary votes.

24        Any more under Article VIII, Section x, there are several

25        of them there.  Hearing none, we'll move on to Article IX,


                     
 

			                                                                          153

1        education.

2             Commissioner Scott.

3             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, the splitting of

4        counties into school districts which is also a specific

5        proposal is the first one.  The second one --

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let's do that one.  He moves the

7        general concept of splitting counties into school

8        districts.  All in favor of going forward with that, raise

9        your hands.

10             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  What's the number, sir?

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It's his on his, Article -- it's

12        the Scott number, Article IX, education, splitting

13        counties into school districts.  All that want to go

14        forward with that general subject, raise your hands.

15             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does carry.  All right.  The

17        next one?

18             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  This was based on the statement

19        of the necessity for additional bonding authority for

20        schools.  Chancellor Reed, the one he raised.  Everybody

21        in favor of going forward with bonding and taxing

22        authorities as the general subject, raise your hand.

23             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  It goes forward.  The next

25        one, reformation of the state board of education.


                     
 

			                                                                          154

1             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Right.  This is the issue that

2        Commissioner Nelson and others -- when they raised that

3        issue, several members and others have commented.  Maybe

4        we need to look at changing the board of education and --

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Reform the Cabinet under Article

6        III.  Everybody in favor of going forward with that

7        general subject, raise your hand.

8             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It goes forward.  All right.

10        We'll now move then to Article IX, Section 1.

11             Commissioner Riley.

12             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to move forward 1-1.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read 1-1.

14             READING CLERK:  Article IX, Section 1-1, "Specific

15        appropriation budget should be designated in the

16        Constitution."

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor of going

18        forward on that, raise your hand.

19             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does not go forward.  There

21        are two others under -- Commissioner Mathis.

22             COMMISSIONER MATHIS:  I'd like to move forward

23        Article IX-1-2.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it, please.

25             READING CLERK:  Article IX, Section 1-2, "Advocates


                     
 

			                                                                          155

1        the language of 1868 Constitution which provided that

2        education shall be paramount in Florida and that there

3        shall be a free public university system."

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor of going

5        forward with that, raise your hand.

6             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  No more tuition.  It keels

8        forward.  Any more?

9             Commissioner Rundle.

10             COMMISSIONER RUNDLE:  I'd like to move 9-1-3.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

12        going forward -- read it.  Read it.

13             READING CLERK:  Article IX, Section 1-3, "Broaden the

14        right to a free education to include the first two years

15        of college."

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Everybody in favor of

17        that proposal, X-1-3, raise your hand.

18             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Goes forward.  No more tuition in

20        the junior college.  Article IX -- good luck, Commissioner

21        Scott.  Commissioner Scott, I'll call you now to Article

22        IX, Section 2.

23             Commissioner Riley.

24             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I move forward IX-2-1.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Read it, please.


                     
 

			                                                                          156

1             READING CLERK:  Article IX, Section 2-1, "Create an

2        appointed rather than elected Commissioner of Education."

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor of considering

4        that and going forward, raise your hand.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does go forward.  Okay.

7        Article IX, Section 4.

8             COMMISSIONER MARSHALL:  Mr. Chairman?

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Marshall.

10             COMMISSIONER MARSHALL:  I ask that we move IX-4-a-2.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  IX-4-a-2.  Would you please read

12        it?

13             READING CLERK:  Article IX, Section 4-a-2, "Allow

14        counties to divide into smaller school districts."

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

16        moving that forward, raise your hand.

17             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does go forward.  All right.

19        We're still on Article IX, Section 4.  All right.  Article

20        IX, Section 5.

21             Commissioner Riley.

22             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to move forward IX-5-1.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Did you want to move

24        that forward too, Commissioner Marshall?

25             COMMISSIONER MARSHALL:  Yes, I did, sir, thank you.


                     
 

			                                                                          157

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article IX, Section 5-1.  All

2        those in favor of moving that forward, would you raise

3        your hand?  I didn't tell you to read it though, did I?

4        Just put your hands down and let him read.

5             READING CLERK:  Article IX, Section 5-1, "Recommends

6        changing to an appointed superintendent of schools."

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Now, everybody raise their

8        hands that wants to go forward with that.

9             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  It does go forward.

11        Article IX, Section x.  Commissioner Barnett rises for

12        another purpose.  Article IX, Section x.

13             (No response.)

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  If nobody wants to --

15        Commissioner Connor.

16             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I'll move IX-x-3,

17        please, sir.

18             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Would you read it,

19        please?

20             READING CLERK:  Article IX-x-3.  Provide for

21        educational vouchers and school choice.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

23        considering educational vouchers and school choice, raise

24        your hands.

25             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)


                     
 

			                                                                          158

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Does not go forward.  All right.

2        Any more under Article IX, Section x?  If not, we'll move

3        forward to Article X -- Commissioner Scott.

4             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  This category, private property

5        rights, there were several proposals presented to the

6        commission that I think we're going to be either sponsored

7        individually and the question of private property rights,

8        20 percent taking one of them, the guy that spoke I think

9        it was in -- I don't know where it was, Tampa --

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You move a broad subject on

11        Article X of private property rights.  All in favor of

12        considering it and going forward, raise your hand.

13             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does.  Okay.

15             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  And the environmental bonding

16        authority, we need to clarify that with the P2000 issue

17        that would affect maybe some others.  But that's the

18        proposal we're talking about.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  And there might have been another

20        one but it would embrace it if it did.

21             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Right.

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

23        the environmental bonding authority general subject going

24        forward, raise your hands.

25             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)


                     
 

			                                                                          159

1             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  It does pass.  Okay.

2        Limitation of homestead.  Limitation of homestead

3        exemption for bankruptcy or criminal seizure.  We've had

4        something on that but not the bankruptcy part I think.  We

5        already passed the other one, didn't we?  Anybody want to

6        consider the limitation of homestead exemption for

7        bankruptcy, I guess would be the best way to put it since

8        we have done the other one already.  If you do, raise your

9        hand, if you want to limit the homestead exemption in

10        bankruptcy matters.

11             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  If you want to consider it.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I mean consider doing it because

13        some of us might go bankrupt.

14             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does get enough votes to

16        consider.  Then you have the general subject which we've

17        already referred to, sovereign immunity, which you put

18        here to be consistent.  Did Commissioner Rundle rise for a

19        wonderful purpose?

20             COMMISSIONER RUNDLE:  Yes, sir.  You didn't say "or

21        criminal seizure."  So just to make sure, I would like to

22        move X-4-a-2.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We'll get there.  X-4-a-2, we

24        didn't get there, but we're there now.  Okay.

25        Commissioner Rundle moves that we consider -- we're in


                     
 

			                                                                          160

1        Article X now -- that we consider Article X-4-a-2.  Would

2        you read that, please?

3             READING CLERK:  Article X, Section 4-a-2, "Amend

4        Article X, Section 4, to clarify the homestead property

5        should not be protected from forfeiture actions."

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

7        moving that forward, raise your hand.

8             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does go forward.  Any more

10        under Article X, Section 4?  If not, we'll move on.

11             (No response.)

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article X, Section 6?

13             Commissioner Riley.

14             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to have move forward

15        X-6-2.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  X-6-2, please read.

17             READING CLERK:  Article X, Section 6-2, "Make changes

18        to the eminent domain law."

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I'd say that's good.  We'll make

20        it stronger.

21             All those in favor of moving that forward.

22             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Did not pass.  Still on Article

24        IV, Section 6 -- 7 we go to now.  Article X -- I was

25        reading the 4 on the other one.


                     
 

			                                                                          161

1             Commissioner Morsani.

2             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  Mr. Chairman, to digress for

3        just a moment, I think you jumped over Article X, Section

4        2.  That goes back to some of the discussion we had

5        earlier this morning, sir --

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That's right.  It happened when

7        she moved the 4 and I just kept going.

8             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  I understand.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  If you want to move, we'll call

10        Article X Section 2 since there is a long provision there

11        that includes those two items I think.

12             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  I think they relate to what we

13        talked about this morning.  I don't know if they need to

14        be discussed again.

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think we already acted on

16        those.

17             COMMISSIONER MORSANI:  Thank you.  That's what I

18        thought.  Thank you.

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  Now, we will get back on

20        to where I was improperly, Article X, Section 7.

21             (No response.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Nobody wants to roll the dice.

23        Okay.  Article X, Section 10.

24             Commissioner Barkdull, do you want to move one of

25        those?


                     
 

			                                                                          162

1             (No response.)

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We'll move to Article

3        X, Section 11.

4             (No response.)

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Move on to Article X, Section 13.

6        Yes.

7             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  Article X-13-2.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Article X-13-2.  Read

9        it, please.

10             READING CLERK:  Article X, Section 13-2, "Eliminate

11        the cap on the waiver of sovereign immunity."

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor, raise your

13        hand.

14             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does pass.  All right.

16        Commissioner Anthony moves X-13-1 -- you didn't, okay.  I

17        thought they were saying you did.  Article X, Section 14.

18             Commissioner Riley.

19             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  I'd like to move forward X-14-1.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it, please.

21             READING CLERK:  Article X, Section 14-1, "Make

22        provisions that dues of the Florida Retirement System

23        should be adequately protected."

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of going

25        forward on that, raise your hand.  We heard from them at


                     
 

			                                                                          163

1        every public hearing.

2             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Any more under Article X, Section

4        14?  One more.  Okay.

5             Article X, Section 15, Judge Wetherington -- or

6        Commissioner Wetherington, you are no longer one of those.

7             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  On Article X, Section

8        14 -- Article X, Section 14, Subsection 2.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes.

10             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  I want to move that.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  You move X-14-2?

12             COMMISSIONER WETHERINGTON:  Yes.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Read it, please.

14             READING CLERK:  Article X, Section 14-2, "Amend

15        Article X, Section 14, to provide that the administration

16        of the public retirement system shall require the Board of

17        Trustees to hold and invest all the assets for the

18        exclusive purpose of providing benefits to all members."

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

20        that, raise your hand.

21             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

22             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does go forward.  Okay.

23        Article X, Section 15.  Commissioner Zack moves Article X,

24        Section 15.  Would you read X-15-1?

25             READING CLERK:  Article X, Section 15-1, "Require


                     
 

			                                                                          164

1        lottery funds to be supplemental to general revenue with

2        general revenue being no less than 4 percent of the actual

3        percentage of the general revenue budget allocation to

4        education as it was at the time the lottery was approved."

5             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

6        that, raise your hand to be considered further.

7             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does go forward.  Article X,

9        Section 16.  You've got your choice there, men, ladies.

10             (No response.)

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Article X, Section X.

12             (No response.)

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  We'll go to Article XI.

14             Commissioner Scott, Article XI.

15             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, again without

16        stating a position in favor of these issues were three of

17        the ones that were raised.  The number of signatures

18        required, the question of having statutory initiatives and

19        the question of limiting or having a period of time before

20        an issue could come back and be repeated.

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Wouldn't it be appropriate here

22        to reduce -- and to considering the subject of statutory

23        and constitutional initiatives?

24             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Yes, it would be.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It is so moved that that's what


                     
 

			                                                                          165

1        we'll consider.  All those in favor of considering that,

2        raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We don't need to count that one.

5        Everybody raise their hand.  All right.  Then we will move

6        on to -- let me see where I am -- Article XI, Section 2.

7             (No response.)

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Article XI, Section 3.  There's a

9        lot of those so take a little time.

10             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Point of clarification.

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Commissioner Connor.

12             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  On Mr. Scott's motion, do I

13        now -- do I correctly understand what we passed was number

14        of signatures required for constitutional and statutory

15        initiative petitions?

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  What we did is passed the entire

17        subject to constitutional initiative for the Constitution

18        or statutory and the attendant matters relating thereto.

19             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Did that include repetitive

20        initiatives?

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes, it did.

22             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  It did.  Thank you.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  We're now on Article

24        XI, Section 3.  Okay.  Somebody needs to get going here.

25        Bring up one of them and let's see how we're going to do.


                     
 

			                                                                          166

1             COMMISSIONER ZACK:  I believe they are included in

2        the overall heading.

3             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  The only one maybe --

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think a three fifths vote for

5        approval certainly was not and he moved that --

6        Commissioner Scott moves X-3-1.  Would you read that,

7        please?

8             READING CLERK:  Article XI, Section 3-1, "Require a

9        three fifths vote for approval of constitutional

10        amendments."

11             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of going forward on

12        that, raise your hand.

13             COMMISSIONER LANGLEY:  Vote by commission or --

14             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  He doesn't say.  He says a three

15        fifths vote for approval of constitutional amendments.  It

16        could be interpreted to be considered either way, three

17        fifths of those voting, three fifths of the electorate, or

18        whatever.

19             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Mr. Chairman, just to clarify

20        this issue has been an issue with Tax Watch and a number

21        of these people listed here.  What they want is to have a

22        three fifths vote of the people voting in the election for

23        a constitutional amendment.

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  And that's what you're moving for

25        consideration?


                     
 

			                                                                          167

1             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  Well, for purposes of

2        consideration.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  I mean, you're not moving

4        that.  You're moving that for consideration and that's

5        what everybody does.

6             SECRETARY BLANTON:  We need to add the word "people";

7        is that correct?  We need to clarify it by adding

8        "people."

9             COMMISSIONER SCOTT:  I withdraw it, see if anybody --

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I don't think -- I don't believe

11        we've got ten votes.  Just a quick head count.

12             SECRETARY BLANTON:  Okay.  It didn't get the votes.

13             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Is it understood that

14        everything on here that relates to the initiatives is

15        included in the general one so that we consider that

16        anything that's on this list other than the one we didn't

17        pass is available to be moved forward?  We need to make a

18        note if that's true, otherwise we should go down and do

19        some of them individually.

20             Commissioner Barnett.

21             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  There is one that I wonder if

22        it's appropriately included:  Allow Floridians to vote on

23        all constitutional amendments.  Is that -- what does that

24        mean?  I thought that was currently --

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We have to do it now.


                     
 

			                                                                          168

1             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  Yeah, that's what I thought we

2        did now.  So what does that mean?

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It means that we consider leaving

4        it like it is.

5             COMMISSIONER BARNETT:  Or changing it?

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I guess we could under that

7        general notion.

8             Commissioner Connor.

9             COMMISSIONER CONNOR:  Mr. Chairman, I think there is

10        a question in the minds of some as to whether or not

11        Mr. Scott's proposal which had to do with number of

12        signatures required for initiatives and as I understand

13        statutory petitions was intended to include number of

14        signatures and votes required.  No, it was not?  Thank

15        you.

16             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Let me point out to you, if you

17        want a specific proposal out of one of these public

18        proposals drafted, you need to bring it up now and move

19        it.  Or you can draft your own if you like.  For example,

20        if you want to provide for the statutory initiative and

21        you want a proposal to that effect, then you need to move

22        it here today.

23             Commissioner Mills.  I mean for consideration then

24        there would be a draft -- one of the drafts would be to

25        provide for a statutory initiative.


                     
 

			                                                                          169

1             COMMISSIONER MILLS:  If it is necessary to do that,

2        to get a draft, then I'll so move.

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It would be certainly advisable

4        to get a separate draft.  All those in favor of that,

5        raise your hand -- excuse me, read it, please.  It's

6        X-3-3 -- excuse me.

7             READING CLERK:  Article 11, Section 3-3, "Provide for

8        statutory initiatives."

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor of that being

10        considered, raise your hand.  Okay.  Carried forward.  Any

11        others anybody wants to move while we're still here?

12             Commissioner Evans.

13             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  Based on the same reasoning I

14        move X-3-13 --

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  X-3-13, read, please.

16             COMMISSIONER EVANS:  -- I mean 11-3-13.

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes.

18             READING CLERK:  Article XI, Section 3-13, "When a

19        citizen's initiative is submitted for review by the Courts

20        as required by law and the Court rejects the initiative on

21        the basis of inadequate or unclear ballot title in

22        summary, the Court shall direct the Secretary of State to

23        prepare such title and summary with wording that is

24        satisfactory to the Court."

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think you got a separation of


                     
 

			                                                                          170

1        powers problem here, don't you?  Okay.  We can certainly

2        get one.  Everybody in favor of that, raise your hand.

3             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  That one is gone.

5             Commissioner Nabors.

6             COMMISSIONER NABORS:  Make sure the staff's time is

7        occupied.  I'll move XII-3-4.

8             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  XII-3-4, read it, please.

9             READING CLERK:  Article XI, Section 3-4, "Limit

10        initiatives to the framework of government and not to

11        government regulation."

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All those in favor of that,

13        please raise your hand.

14             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

15             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  There will not be one

16        drafted on that.  It didn't not go forward.

17             All right.  Got any more?

18             (No response.)

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Okay.  We'll go to Article 12 --

20        excuse me, Commissioner Mathis.

21             COMMISSIONER MATHIS:  I would like to submit Article

22        XI, 3-12.

23             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  3-12.  Would you read it, please?

24             READING CLERK:  Article XI, Section 312, "Provide

25        that initiatives must first be submitted to the


                     
 

			                                                                          171

1        Legislature.  The Legislature would then have two years to

2        act or the initiative would be placed on the ballot."

3             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

4        moving that forward, raise your hand.

5             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Does not go forward.

7        Commissioner Evans-Jones.

8             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  I don't see it on here,

9        Mr. Chairman, but I remember the members of the Methodist

10        church presented one that said you can't bring it back for

11        so many years.  Is that on here and I just don't see it?

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  I think that was in one of the

13        public hearings that we didn't have on this list.  We'll

14        take it the next time.

15             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  Okay.  Thank you.

16             (Off-the-record comment.)

17             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It's in your initiative?  Oh,

18        he's got it in here as repetitive initiatives.

19             COMMISSIONER EVANS-JONES:  All right.  And is that to

20        be considered?

21             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  That general subject -- actually,

22        that's a specific subject really.  So it would go forward,

23        either way, that's correct.  It is going forward.  All

24        right.  We go now to Article XII.  And, Commissioner

25        Scott, Article XII.  All right.  That's the P2000


                     
 

			                                                                          172

1        provision.

2             Commissioner Henderson.

3             COMMISSIONER HENDERSON:  I know we had the general

4        language but just for the purpose of drafting the proposal

5        I'd move forward XII-9-2.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  9-2 is moved by Commissioner

7        Henderson.  All those in favor of going forward -- excuse

8        me all those in favor of reading it -- well, wait a

9        minute.  Read it, please.

10             READING CLERK:  Article XII, Section 9-2, "Establish

11        a Florida land and water conservation fund using revenues

12        dedicated from documentary stamps to support long-term

13        debt and pay-as-you-go programs to purchase high quality

14        state conservation lands, grants to the local governments

15        for community based conservation projects, funding

16        environmental restoration projects on public lands, and

17        financing incentives for long-term conservation

18        stewardship of private lands."

19             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All in favor of

20        moving that forward, raise your hand.

21             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

22             It does go forward.  Commissioner Barkdull, do you

23        move one of these?

24             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Yes, sir, XII-9-4.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Would you please read it?


                     
 

			                                                                          173

1             READING CLERK:  Article XII, Section 9-4, "The time

2        limits for bonding for land preservation should be

3        extended from 2013 to 2020."

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  All those in favor of

5        moving forward on that subject, please raise your hand.

6             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

7             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It does go forward.  Any more on

8        Section -- Article XII?

9             (No response.

10             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  Article XII, Section

11        X.

12             Commissioner Barkdull, for what purpose do you rise?

13             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  To indicate to the Chair that

14        the secretary of the commission has indicated to me that

15        if we want clarification to appear in the journal as to

16        what the process is concerning public proposals that were

17        specifically raised but did not get ten votes as to where

18        they lie today, it is my understanding that the ruling of

19        the Chair was that if they did not get ten votes and they

20        were within the purview of the items Commissioner Scott

21        brought forth they were still alive.  But if they were

22        outside of the purview of the items that Commissioner

23        Scott brought forth they, for all intents and purposes,

24        did not go forward.

25             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  If that's what the rules


                     
 

			                                                                          174

1        committee told me they did, my ruling would have been

2        that.

3             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Okay.  Thank you.

4             SECRETARY BLANTON:  He wants that exchange in the

5        journal.

6             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  We had that exchange then.

7             SECRETARY BLANTON:  We'll spread that in the journal.

8             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  That will now appear in the

9        journal, Ms. Secretary?

10             SECRETARY BLANTON:  Yes.

11             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Thank you.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.

13             Commissioner Sundberg?

14             COMMISSIONER SUNDBERG:  Mr. Chairman, if we may,

15        please, if you would indulge me to recur to Article X,

16        Section 16.  I really thought it was otherwise subsumed

17        under another issue.  Lest anyone get the impression

18        because of the great public interest in this issue, I

19        would like to move for consideration, X-16-2.

20             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  X-16-2 has been moved for

21        consideration by Commissioner Sundberg.  Read it, please.

22             READING CLERK:  Article X, Section 16-2, "Do not

23        change, delete, or modify the net ban."

24             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All in favor of going forward

25        with that, raise your hand.


                     
 

			                                                                          175

1             (Whereupon, the vote was taken.)

2             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It's 11 votes or more, it goes

3        forward.  All right.  Does anybody else got any that they

4        want to bring up that we missed, now is the time.

5             Commissioner Riley?

6             COMMISSIONER RILEY:  Mr. Chairman, not to specific

7        proposals but to one of the only two issues on

8        Commissioner Scott's list that did not go forward.  I

9        would like to present again regulation of attorneys with

10        the understanding that we're not making judgments here,

11        we're just putting it out on the table.

12             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  It is out of order.  It's been

13        defeated.  It did not go forward.  We can't do it that

14        way.  You lose once, you lose, unless somebody on the

15        prevailing side moves to reconsider.

16             All right.  I think we're about where we're -- we

17        will approach the -- being able to adjourn.  Before we do,

18        I'd like to say at the appropriate time we're going to

19        give certificates to those members who attended every

20        public hearing and there were several.  We're not going to

21        give certificates to those that missed the most meetings

22        but we are going to recognize those that made every

23        meeting.  And I think we all need to be most appreciative

24        for those members who did that and they went to great

25        effort.


                     
 

			                                                                          176

1             Commissioner Barkdull.

2             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  Is the Chair ready to

3        entertain a motion that we recess?

4             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  Yes, Your Honor.

5             COMMISSIONER BARKDULL:  I'd like to move that we

6        recess to reconvene in session upon call of the Chair and

7        to convene in committee meetings upon the call of the

8        Chair.

9             CHAIRMAN DOUGLASS:  All right.  I think that takes

10        precedent over anything on the floor.  All those in favor

11        say "aye."  We are adjourned -- or recessed.

12             (Session adjourned at 2:30 p.m.)

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25


                 
 

                                                                       177

1            				   CERTIFICATE

2

3   	  STATE OF FLORIDA:

4   	  COUNTY OF LEON:

5
              WE, JULIE L. DOHERTY and KRISTEN L. BENTLEY, Court
6   	  Reporters, certify that we were authorized to and did
              stenographically report the foregoing proceedings
7   	  and that the transcript is a true and complete
              record of our stenographic notes.
8

9                      DATED this ______ day of ____________, 1997.

10

11
                          _________________________________
12                      JULIE L. DOHERTY, CP, RPR

13

14                      _________________________________
                          KRISTEN L. BENTLEY
15                      COURT REPORTERS
                          DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
16                      1230 APALACHEE PARKWAY
                          TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA  32399-3060
17                      (904) 488-9675

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25